1995
DOI: 10.1080/03003939508433777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional socio‐economic variations and deprivation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aligning groups would necessitate removing some important demographic groups in England, limiting the ability to identify trends in some sociodemographic groups. Secondly, indices of multiple deprivation exist for England at regional levels [16]; these indices permit an exploration of relationship between deprivation and our three response variables. This exclusion criterion reduces the respective sample sizes to 14,222 (2020 survey) and 14,526 (2022 survey) after respondents who do not reside in England are removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aligning groups would necessitate removing some important demographic groups in England, limiting the ability to identify trends in some sociodemographic groups. Secondly, indices of multiple deprivation exist for England at regional levels [16]; these indices permit an exploration of relationship between deprivation and our three response variables. This exclusion criterion reduces the respective sample sizes to 14,222 (2020 survey) and 14,526 (2022 survey) after respondents who do not reside in England are removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2019 English indices of multiple deprivation (IMD) [16] are used as regional covariates to explain variability in regional level outcomes, with the mean index taken for all lower authority areas in each of the 33 ITL regions. IMDs measure deprivation in different areas of England and were developed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (formerly the Department for Communities and Local Government).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%