1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00450620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional patterns of sulfur retention in watersheds of the Eastern US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes can occur even in the absence of additional depositionai changes. For example, in the mid-Appalachian and southeastern portions of the United States, soils are continuing to retain sulfate by inorganic absorption onto oxide surfaces and will not achieve steady state for several decades (Rochelle and Church 1987). Therefore, one would not want to use observed relationships between depositional fluxes of sulfate and the concentrations of this species in surface waters to project future surface water sulfate concentrations.…”
Section: Empirical and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These changes can occur even in the absence of additional depositionai changes. For example, in the mid-Appalachian and southeastern portions of the United States, soils are continuing to retain sulfate by inorganic absorption onto oxide surfaces and will not achieve steady state for several decades (Rochelle and Church 1987). Therefore, one would not want to use observed relationships between depositional fluxes of sulfate and the concentrations of this species in surface waters to project future surface water sulfate concentrations.…”
Section: Empirical and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Export of SO4-appears to be due to oxidation of the organic S contained in the forest vegetation and soil by fire and leaching of the released SO 4-via streamflow. Clearcutting (and herbicide application) would presumably release S contained in the dead debris but the appearance of SO4-in streams is mediated by soil absorption which varies widely in North America (Rochelle & Church 1987).…”
Section: Chemical Concentrations In Stream After Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As SO 4 -S inputs have decreased to WS4, we may be seeing release of S in recent years due to lower concentrations in deposition, as hypothesized by Rochelle and Church (1987) and Reuss and Johnson (1986). Sulfate adsorption can be induced by increasing SO 4 concentration and suggesting saturation of SO adsorption capacity, at least in the streamside zone.…”
Section: Internal Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 93%