2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional patterns in hydrologic response, a new three-component metric for hydrograph analysis and implications for ecohydrology, Northwest Volcanic Aquifer Study Area, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that among the six USGS methods, the HYSEP Minimum method provided the lowest estimate of baseflow almost year-round in all seasons. Similar results were also report in Curtis et al (2020) where the six USGS methods were applied to 312 watersheds in the USA for baseflow separation. They found that the HYSEP Minimum method provided the lowest estimate of baseflow and thereafter suggested HYSEP Minimum as the most robust method for removing snowmelt runoff in baseflow estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that among the six USGS methods, the HYSEP Minimum method provided the lowest estimate of baseflow almost year-round in all seasons. Similar results were also report in Curtis et al (2020) where the six USGS methods were applied to 312 watersheds in the USA for baseflow separation. They found that the HYSEP Minimum method provided the lowest estimate of baseflow and thereafter suggested HYSEP Minimum as the most robust method for removing snowmelt runoff in baseflow estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, these approaches basically rely on determining the points where baseflow intersects the rising and falling limbs of the surface runoff response, which are essentially arbitrary (Szilagyi and Parlange, 1998). Various digital filtering techniques with large variations in complexities have also been used for hydrograph separation, but they still suffer from the lack of hydrological basis and the disadvantage of arbitrary choice of separation parameters (Chapman, 1999;Furey and Gupta, 2001;Eckhardt, 2005;Piggott et al, 2005;Foks et al, 2019;Shao et al, 2020). The results from these approaches often need to be carefully assessed before they are considered to be hydrologically valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Northwest Volcanic Aquifer Study Area (NVASA, Curtis et al 2020) project is a US Geological Survey (USGS) effort to understand and quantify regional water resources in the Pacific Northwest. This manuscript analyzes geologic controls on groundwater flow in the SLMSA (Figs.…”
Section: Purpose and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, traditional hydrograph separation approaches are still widely used because of the modest data requirements and ease of implementation. Recent improvement in hydrograph separation includes new parameterisation strategies (Pelletier and Andréassian, 2020) and recognition of multiple baseflow components in the streamflow (Curtis et al, 2020;Stoelzle et al, 2020). Nevertheless, since traditional hydrograph separation methods are based on a number of simplifications and assumptions that limit their applicability, previous studies have widely recognised that more effort is required to evaluate the limitations and their effects, and when possible, the methods should be combined with other methods and data to address these limitations (Hooper and Shoemaker, 1986;Stewart et al, 2007;Rosenberry and LaBaugh, 2008;Miller et al, 2014;).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%