2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00307.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional obesity determinants in the United States: a model of myopic addictive behavior in food consumption

Abstract: Obesity is considered one of the largest public health problems in the United States today. The premise for our study is a body of results from medical research showing that sweetened foods, i.e., an increased consumption of sugars, leads first to sugar addiction and second to carbohydrate addiction and increased consumption of fats. The latter feature is actually responsible for the increase in body mass index (BMI), but the trigger that produces cravings for extra calories is sugar and sweeteners. Based on o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, two additional studies drew on the individual‐level BRFSS data that were merged with county‐level price data obtained from the USDA on sugar, potatoes, and whole milk to examine associations between current prices and overweight and obesity prevalence within a rational addiction model that controlled for historical and future prices (Miljkovic, Nganje, and de Chastenet 2008) and using a myopic addiction model that controlled historical prices (Miljkovic and Nganje 2008). In the first study, which included future prices, the authors found that individuals' weight was significantly negatively associated with the current price of sweet foods but that a future increase in the price of sweet foods was not associated with a current reduction in weight.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Evidence For Prices and Weight Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, two additional studies drew on the individual‐level BRFSS data that were merged with county‐level price data obtained from the USDA on sugar, potatoes, and whole milk to examine associations between current prices and overweight and obesity prevalence within a rational addiction model that controlled for historical and future prices (Miljkovic, Nganje, and de Chastenet 2008) and using a myopic addiction model that controlled historical prices (Miljkovic and Nganje 2008). In the first study, which included future prices, the authors found that individuals' weight was significantly negatively associated with the current price of sweet foods but that a future increase in the price of sweet foods was not associated with a current reduction in weight.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Evidence For Prices and Weight Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study, which included future prices, the authors found that individuals' weight was significantly negatively associated with the current price of sweet foods but that a future increase in the price of sweet foods was not associated with a current reduction in weight. In their second study, the authors argued that the myopic model was more appropriate and that such addicts were unable to exhibit self‐control or rationalize their behavior and were unlikely to be able to predict changes in future prices and adjust their consumption (Miljkovic and Nganje 2008). The results from this study showed that a one‐dollar increase in the current price of sugar (the addictive food product) was associated with a 0.20 and 0.33 percentage point reduction in the probability of overweight and obesity, respectively.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Evidence For Prices and Weight Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the current trend of obesity, 50 percent of the US population will be obese in 2030 [3]. According to many studies, diabetes (type II), heart disease, hypertension, cancer, diabetes, asthma, and some psychological disorders link to obesity [4][5][6]. Obesity increases the risk of premature mortality [7] and is associated with nearly 300,000 annual deaths in the United States [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exception is the study by Miljkovic and Nganje (2008) that shows that a $1 increase in the price of sugar is 8 Experience with tobacco tax regulation further underscores the power of price changes to influence purchasing behavior and, ultimately, public health (Gruber 2002). …”
Section: Price Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%