2016
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160718013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional models for distributed flash-flood nowcasting: towards an estimation of potential impacts and damages

Abstract: Abstract. Flash floods monitoring systems developed up to now generally enable a real-time assessment of the potential flash-floods magnitudes based on highly distributed hydrological models and weather radar records. The approach presented here aims to go one step ahead by offering a direct assessment of the potential impacts of flash floods on inhabited areas. This approach is based on an a priori analysis of the considered area in order (1) to evaluate based on a semi-automatic hydraulic approach (Cartino m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major issues remains in the fact that the flood envelope may vary, based on the severity of the flood. Even if some studies try to work on the subject [23] the difficulty to generalize this differentiation to the entire South of France has led us to only consider the larger flood-prone area.…”
Section: Delineation Of the Flood-prone Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major issues remains in the fact that the flood envelope may vary, based on the severity of the flood. Even if some studies try to work on the subject [23] the difficulty to generalize this differentiation to the entire South of France has led us to only consider the larger flood-prone area.…”
Section: Delineation Of the Flood-prone Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…limited risk of backwater influences). The selected roughness coefficient value of 0.05, an average value based on post-event studies (Lumbroso and Gaume, 2012), corresponds well to the locally adjusted one.…”
Section: Comparison Of Water Levels At Stream Gauges Locations (Alès Case Study)mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…3). The roughness coefficient is fixed to n = 0.05 according to the conclusions of Lumbroso and Gaume (2012) about the relevant range of roughness values in the case of flash floods. The downstream limit condition for each reach is the water level computed for the downstream river reach for the discharge of the same return period.…”
Section: Definition Of the Impact Model Based On A Catalogue Of Flood Extent Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%