2021
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1934432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional migration, entrepreneurship and university alumni

Abstract: and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Results remain significant when using robust standard errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also attribute to human capital a significant role in increasing innovation in STPs. This resonates with other findings that show that the economic reforms introduced since the 1980s propagated the flow of highly skilled labour towards the metropolitan regions and spurred entrepreneurship (Wu & Eesley, 2022). STPs have played an important role in accommodating entrepreneurs, especially highly educated ones, who are actively involved in innovation activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also attribute to human capital a significant role in increasing innovation in STPs. This resonates with other findings that show that the economic reforms introduced since the 1980s propagated the flow of highly skilled labour towards the metropolitan regions and spurred entrepreneurship (Wu & Eesley, 2022). STPs have played an important role in accommodating entrepreneurs, especially highly educated ones, who are actively involved in innovation activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This created competition among host cities and their corresponding STPs. Cities that host better performing STPs have been more successful in attracting high‐skilled labour as well as new capital investment, thereby further expanding their scale and innovation capabilities (Hu, 2007; Wang et al, 2016; Wu & Eesley, 2022). This process can be self‐reinforcing and lead to a so‐called Matthew effect for better performing STPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is that special economic zones do not focus on technology companies, and thus innovation‐based strategies may be less relevant. Another reason is that cocoon institutions at a larger scale (e.g., economic zones) might have less significant impact on startups than more localized cocoon institutions (e.g., science parks), because there may be other regional differences in addition to the cocoon effects (Wu & Eesley, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%