2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional measurements and spatial/temporal analysis of CDOM in 10,000+ optically variable Minnesota lakes using Landsat 8 imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long‐term data for CDOM and other DOM measures across the Upper Great Lakes region are relatively sparse (Stanley et al 2019), but several studies support climatic variation as a major driver of Mississippi River color variability and change. Remote sensing of lake CDOM across Minnesota (Olmanson et al 2020) found strong climate controls over interannual lake CDOM variability in northern Minnesota, and unusually wet conditions (perhaps representative of future climate in the region) were associated with marked CDOM increases compared with typical annual precipitation levels. Similarly, a study of two Wisconsin bogs showed strong dependence of DOC concentration on climate variables, especially drought, which depressed DOC (Bertolet et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Long‐term data for CDOM and other DOM measures across the Upper Great Lakes region are relatively sparse (Stanley et al 2019), but several studies support climatic variation as a major driver of Mississippi River color variability and change. Remote sensing of lake CDOM across Minnesota (Olmanson et al 2020) found strong climate controls over interannual lake CDOM variability in northern Minnesota, and unusually wet conditions (perhaps representative of future climate in the region) were associated with marked CDOM increases compared with typical annual precipitation levels. Similarly, a study of two Wisconsin bogs showed strong dependence of DOC concentration on climate variables, especially drought, which depressed DOC (Bertolet et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NLF comprises the upper half of the Headwaters watershed, and is composed of 49% forested area (mixed conifers and hardwoods), 27% wetlands, 9% open water, and only 11% agricultural and urban land (2011 National Land Cover data; Homer et al 2015). Surface waters in the NLF ecoregion have higher CDOM levels than those in the NCHF (Griffin et al 2018; Olmanson et al 2020), and the NLF likely is the source of most of the allochthonous DOM in the river at Minneapolis. The NCHF, a transitional ecoregion between the relatively pristine NLF and heavily agricultural ecoregions of southern Minnesota, was 48% agricultural land, 9% urban land, 12% open water, and only 10% wetlands in 2011 (Homer et al 2015).…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We constructed the LimnoSat‐US database by extracting the surface reflectance values of high confidence water pixels (Jones, 2019) from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery across 56,792 lakes contained within the HydoLAKES database (Messager et al., 2016). While these surface reflectance images were originally developed for terrestrial applications, a growing body of research shows that they can be used to accurately estimate inland water quality parameters and perform on par with water‐specific atmospheric correction algorithms (Griffin et al., 2018; Kuhn et al., 2019; Olmanson et al., 2020). To avoid signal noise from surrounding land pixels and bottom reflectance in shallow waters, we take the median reflectance values from within 120 meters of the deepest point for each waterbody (Shen et al., 2015), where the deepest point refers to the portion of the lake that is furthest away from the lake shoreline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for model training and validation was derived from a variant of the AquaSat database (15) which combines historical water quality measurements from the Water Quality Portal (3) and LAGOS-NE (2) with coincident (+/-1 day) satellite images from the USGS tier 1 surface reflectance collections for Landsat 5, 7, and 8. While the atmospheric corrections used to generate these surface reflectance products were originally developed for terrestrial applications, a growing body of research shows that they can be used to accurately estimate inland water quality parameters and perform on par with water-specific atmospheric correction algorithms (16)(17)(18). Site IDs from AquaSat were spatially joined to lake polygons from NHDPlusV2 (14) (NHD) and then linked to catchment level metrics from the LakeCat database (19).…”
Section: Data Processing and Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%