Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has become an accepted tool for monitoring regional ventilation. Interest is growing to derive additional information on pulmonary perfusion and ventilation/perfusion distribution. Favoured approach is the impedance indicator dilution technique. Until now hyperosmolar sodium chloride solutions (5.8% and 20%NaCl) have been used as indicators in experiments which, however, may be problematic in view of side effects and are not approved for application in patients. Different radiographic contrast media (CM) approved for use in patients and five reference solutions were tested in vitro. Resistivities were measured in blood at 37°C by a conductivity meter (LF39, Meinsberg GmbH, Germany) in the indicator content range from 0 to 28 Vol%. Three non-ionic CM: Iodixanol, Iomeprol, Iobitridol and two ionic CM: Ioxaglate and Diatrizoate were examined. As references 0.9%, 5.8% and 20%NaCl as well as isotonic (4.5%) and hypertonic (18.2%) glucose solutions were included. Proportionality Proportionality between test solution concentration and determined resistivity changes was proven by regression/correlation analysis. Non-ionic CM induced linear increases of blood resistivity by 80% (Iodixanol), 75% (Iomeprol) and 66% (Iobitridol) at the highest test concentration of 28Vol%. Ionic CM changed resistivity by 13% (Ioxaglate) and 24% (Diatrizoate). The determined r 2 -values were > 0.988. Both hyperosmolar NaCl solutions caused marked but non-linear resistivity lowering by -82% resp. -95% with poor r 2 -values < 0.6. Glucose solutions increased resistivity by 17% resp. 29%, r 2 -value 0.98. Hyperosmolar NaCl-solutions effect impressive changes of resistivity but may imply errors in the evaluation of indicator dilution curves by non-linearity. The resistivity changes by the approved non-ionic radiographic CM are not complicated by linearity problems. A comparison with the simple blood dilution effect by isotonic non-ionic reference solutions indicates additional mechanisms of resistivity increment by CM. In conclusion CM should be evaluated further on in view of EIT-based perfusion assessment in patients.