2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00293-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Innovation Governance in the Context of European Integration and Multi-level Governance Challenges. A Case Study of North-West Region of Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to that, certain traditional EU member states who honored their legal obligations under the 2015 CE package, claim that Romania has an unfair economical competitive advantage. Finally, the multi-level governance system required by the CE, "top-down" and "bottom-up" [10], is almost unfunctional in Romania, especially at regional level, and the influence of the private economic sector exists only at the lower levels of government [11][12][13]. From the business environment perspective, there are currently no examples of economic agglomerations in Romania where the CE best practices have been implemented [14] nor a proper organizational culture prepared to adopt those principles [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to that, certain traditional EU member states who honored their legal obligations under the 2015 CE package, claim that Romania has an unfair economical competitive advantage. Finally, the multi-level governance system required by the CE, "top-down" and "bottom-up" [10], is almost unfunctional in Romania, especially at regional level, and the influence of the private economic sector exists only at the lower levels of government [11][12][13]. From the business environment perspective, there are currently no examples of economic agglomerations in Romania where the CE best practices have been implemented [14] nor a proper organizational culture prepared to adopt those principles [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the present paper examines students' entrepreneurial intention as result of formal and entrepreneurship education in the specific economic context of Bihor County, Romania. Our analysis is part of a larger research into inclusive entrepreneurship in Romania as a driver of regional development [16], [17] and related with our previous research about entrepreneurship education [18], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several valuable proposals have been concluded while analyzing an innovative policy that takes into account smart specializations for emerging regions in Poland (Kamrowska-Zaluska and Soltys, 2016). Similar studies, in Europe (Thalassinos et al, 2015) and in other countries, were presented the process of identifying smart specializations for Romania (Sandu, 2012;Dodescu and Chirilă, 2012), for Lithuania (Paliokaitė, Martinaitis and Sarpong, 2016) and for Slovakia (Borseková, Vaňová and Vitálišová, 2017). It should also be noted the interesting studies conducted on the role of smart specialization in less-developed countries (Krammer, 2017), as well as the research on smart specialization policies as a support for the sustainable development policy in the face of new global challenges (Rusu, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%