2016
DOI: 10.1080/20780389.2016.1175298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Income Distribution in Mexico: New Long-Term Evidence, 1895–2010

Abstract: Abstract:In the last years, Economic History literature has paid close attention to the long-term changes undertaken by regional income inequality in different countries after the integration of their domestic markets. Nevertheless, this literature has mainly focused on developed economies (US and Europe). New evidence is required from peripheral economies, where economic growth has had different features, and income inequality may have been dominated by other forces and followed different trends. The aim of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Labour markets recompose themselves spatially and move income and personal wealth into urban centres. It is not just the United States that has seen the rise of superstar cities and interregional inequalities [Kemeny and Storper 2020]; the trend is the same in Europe and in countries like Mexico [Aguilar-Retureta 2016; Rosés and Wolf 2018].…”
Section: State–city–finance Relations and The Urban Drivers Of Housin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labour markets recompose themselves spatially and move income and personal wealth into urban centres. It is not just the United States that has seen the rise of superstar cities and interregional inequalities [Kemeny and Storper 2020]; the trend is the same in Europe and in countries like Mexico [Aguilar-Retureta 2016; Rosés and Wolf 2018].…”
Section: State–city–finance Relations and The Urban Drivers Of Housin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on their approach to connectivity, scholars may choose different ways to evaluate it. Studies of territorial connectivity may focus on transport networks (Adzhikova, Shkolnikova, 2016); the volume, structure and effectiveness of resource exchange (goods, labour, etc) (Polozhentseva, 2018; Morgoev, 2006;Kirillova, Kantor, 2010;Tian, Zhang, 2019;Fan, Liu, 2020); the correlation 2 and regression relationships between GRP and factors of its development (Polyakova, Simarova, 2014b); and agglomeration processes -through expert evaluation of the interactions (Volchkova et al, 2016). Some studies measure the extent of the deformation at the intersection of production, distribution and consumption of gross product by concentrating on the deviations in the region's indicator value from the national average and on the 'differences between the minimal and maximal values of the indicators across the country' (Panina, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial autocorrelation of production (Dai et al 2017;Pietrzykowski 2019), distribution (Hylton and Ross 2017; Tian and Zhang 2019), and consumption (Khushi et al 2020) are basic points of treatment. In particular, these studies show that indicators characterizing production in one territory depend on the development of production in neighboring territories (Villaverde and Maza 2008;Fabregat and Badia-Miró 2014;Aguilar-Retureta 2016;Díez-Minguela et al 2018;Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay 2019;Gunawan et al 2019). This feature manifests itself in both trade processes and consumption.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%