2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous groundwater flow models that included the Kleine Nete basin used a variety of concepts to represent the geological units playing a role in the local hydrology of the study basin: Batelaan and De Smedt (2004) and Gedeon et al (2007) conceptualized all geological units above the Boom clay as one layer while Verbeiren et al (2006) used five layers according to the geological units listed in Table 1. In both cases satisfying calibration results were obtained.…”
Section: Groundwater System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous groundwater flow models that included the Kleine Nete basin used a variety of concepts to represent the geological units playing a role in the local hydrology of the study basin: Batelaan and De Smedt (2004) and Gedeon et al (2007) conceptualized all geological units above the Boom clay as one layer while Verbeiren et al (2006) used five layers according to the geological units listed in Table 1. In both cases satisfying calibration results were obtained.…”
Section: Groundwater System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a generic repository was investigated, a groundwater model for the entire Netherlands was set up. This contrasts with many groundwater flow studies for disposal of nuclear waste, such as the Forsmark site in Sweden (Hartley & Joyce, 2013), a site in northeast Belgium (Gedeon et al, 2007), the Olkiluoto site in Finland (Blessent et al, 2011), the Sellafield site in the UK (Blum et al, 2005) and Yucca Mountain in the USA (Bodvarsson et al, 1999), where site-specific studies could be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, the recharge rate was adjusted to minimize the difference between the observed and calculated groundwater level contour maps and heads. When this was achieved, the hydraulic conductivity and the specific yield were adjusted to minimize the variance of the differences [40]. The final hydraulic conductivity and the specific yield are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%