2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-012-9546-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional factors rather than forest type drive the community structure of soil living oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida)

Abstract: Most European forests are managed by humans. However, the manner and intensity of management vary. While the effect of forest management on above-ground communities has been investigated in detail, effects on the below-ground fauna remain poorly understood. Oribatid mites are abundant microarthropods in forest soil and important decomposers in terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we investigated the effect of four forest types (i.e., managed coniferous forests; 30 and 70 years old managed beech forests; natural beech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
46
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
46
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contrasted with those of previous studies, which suggested that Oribatida abundance was positively correlated with litter mass and the concentration of C in soil (Erdmann et al, 2012) and negatively correlated with soil pH (Haagvar and Amundsen, 1981;Erdmann et al, 2012) and the concentration of N in litter and fine roots (Erdmann et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result contrasted with those of previous studies, which suggested that Oribatida abundance was positively correlated with litter mass and the concentration of C in soil (Erdmann et al, 2012) and negatively correlated with soil pH (Haagvar and Amundsen, 1981;Erdmann et al, 2012) and the concentration of N in litter and fine roots (Erdmann et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding litter, a strong positive correlation between litter mass and oribatid abundance has been reported in the literature (e.g., Erdmann et al, 2012), but we found no significant correlation in the current study. Because there was also no significant difference in litter depth between the low-and high-yielding plantations (Table A1), we cannot explain this finding Table 4.…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations