2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-007-0185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional economics in its 1950s: recent theoretical directions and future challenges

Abstract: R10, R11,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The former approach has been strongly influenced by economic points of view relating regional development to growth in income or employment, among other variables. This school of thought is called the regional growth perspective (Capello, 2008) and is macroeconomic in nature (see Todaro & Smith, 2012;Wennekers & Thurik, 1999). In this perspective, territorial features were added to the traditional macro-economic approach by treating space as uniform and abstract (Capello, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former approach has been strongly influenced by economic points of view relating regional development to growth in income or employment, among other variables. This school of thought is called the regional growth perspective (Capello, 2008) and is macroeconomic in nature (see Todaro & Smith, 2012;Wennekers & Thurik, 1999). In this perspective, territorial features were added to the traditional macro-economic approach by treating space as uniform and abstract (Capello, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that make economic growth and development possible. For instance, the shift from conceiving regional space as a physical metric and physical container to a diversified/relational has enabled researchers to interpret and model space as an economic resource (Capello, 2008) by restoring the concept of agglomeration inspired in Marshall (Marshall, 1920) and emphasizing the importance of micro-behavioral approaches as well as long-term competitiveness for a region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason is that the regional economy, which includes the location theory, became more popular in the 50s of the 20 th century. (Capello, 2007) Generally, it can be said that since the beginning of 1990, the spatial orientation in economic sciences has been shifted primarily to the development of cities and regions. (Cooke, 2007) As the first fundamental work in the field of industry location theory is regarded the one by Alfred Weber but the major theories in this area are acknowledged to W. Roscher (1865), A. E. Schäffle (1873) and W. Launhardt (1885).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our view is that selective and focussed attempts to highlight general theoretical trends offers a more fruitful basis for a debate on current weaknesses and on possible future directions of regional economics. Inevitably, the set of 'mega-trends' in regional growth analysis offered in this section is both selective and incomplete (Capello, 2008a). Table 1 summarizes the two main 'mega-trends' that, in our view, largely characterize the theoretical developments over the last two decades in regional economics, and that are common to urban economics and to many other disciplines (Capello and Nijkamp, 2004) 2 : the need for more realism, and the move towards dynamic rather than static approaches.…”
Section: Developments In Regional Growth Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%