1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Econometric Models*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…nonborder metropolitan models (Bolton 1985;Hunt and Snell 1997). There are, however, two principal features that distinguish border and nonborder models.…”
Section: Figure 2 Border Region Econometric Forecasting Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…nonborder metropolitan models (Bolton 1985;Hunt and Snell 1997). There are, however, two principal features that distinguish border and nonborder models.…”
Section: Figure 2 Border Region Econometric Forecasting Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Its overall design flexibility has made it an invaluable tool for corporate planning and public policy analysis. In the U.S., these methods have been extensively applied to both regional and metropolitan economies during the past quarter century using quarterly and annual data [Bolton, 1985]. This is especially true in Texas where the comptroller of public accounts maintains an extensive modeling system for the state, its 27 metropolitan areas, and its 254 individual counties [Plaut et al, 1996].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This list is not meant to be exhaustive but rather illustrative of the types of regional models that have been built. For a survey of regional econometric models, see Bolton (1985), for input-output models, see Richardson (1985) or Rose & Miernyk (1989) and, for computable general equilibrium models, see Shoven & Whalley (1984). 2.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%