2020
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in the abiotic environment contribute to genomic divergence within a wild tomato species

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although The Ka/Ks ratio of most duplicated gene pairs were <1 in wild tomato, there were still a considerable number of duplicated genes Ka/Ks > 1, and some of them were from tandem repeats, implying that they were subject to environmental positive selection and still in a rapid evolutionary stage. We speculate that the more complex survival environment has forced wild tomatoes to retain the viability of some adaptive genes (Pailles et al, 2017;Gibson and Moyle, 2020) The evolution of genes in the same family often reflects certain key events in the process of species differentiation and maps the source of conservation and differential functions of its family members. Multispecies orthologous genes showed the complete evolutionary trajectory of the SRO family in tomato.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, although The Ka/Ks ratio of most duplicated gene pairs were <1 in wild tomato, there were still a considerable number of duplicated genes Ka/Ks > 1, and some of them were from tandem repeats, implying that they were subject to environmental positive selection and still in a rapid evolutionary stage. We speculate that the more complex survival environment has forced wild tomatoes to retain the viability of some adaptive genes (Pailles et al, 2017;Gibson and Moyle, 2020) The evolution of genes in the same family often reflects certain key events in the process of species differentiation and maps the source of conservation and differential functions of its family members. Multispecies orthologous genes showed the complete evolutionary trajectory of the SRO family in tomato.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although we included a large number of environmental variables in our study, many other unmeasured ecological forces may also play a role. Second, other evolutionary forces that maintain local genetic diversity, such as balancing selection, may weaken the signal of locusenvironment associations [46]. Third, the multivariate environmental association approach models only linear associations, so nonlinear statistical relationships will not be captured.…”
Section: Evidence For Local Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought tolerance pathways [27] and QTL are widely studied in common bean [28]. Various candidate genes have been identified [29], most with moderate effects as expected for a complex adaptive trait [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%