2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-015-5162-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in crustal structure of the North China Craton from receiver functions

Abstract: Moho depth and crustal average Poisson's ratio for 823 stations are obtained by H- stacking of receiver functions. These, together with topography and receiver function amplitude information, were used to study the crustal structure beneath the North China Craton (NCC). The results suggest that modified and preserved crust coexist beneath the craton with generally Airy-type isostatic equilibrium. The equilibrium is relatively low in the eastern NCC and some local areas in the central and western NCC, which co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains the sharp differences in both tectonic processes (e.g., F. Y. Xu, 2001;Zhu et al, 2011) and structure from the surface to the base of the lithosphere between the eastern and central-western NCC (Figure 26;Chen, 2010;Wei et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2017), and may also be responsible for the similar observations across the boundaries of distinctly different structures and/or deformation in western North America, including the Wyoming craton (Figure 16a,b). The scenario proposed in Figure 27b is consistent with the observed similar depths of the MLD in stable cratonic regions and the LAB in adjacent destroyed cratonic parts or tectonic regions (Figure 24, Chen, 2017;Thybo, 2006, and references therein).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This explains the sharp differences in both tectonic processes (e.g., F. Y. Xu, 2001;Zhu et al, 2011) and structure from the surface to the base of the lithosphere between the eastern and central-western NCC (Figure 26;Chen, 2010;Wei et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2017), and may also be responsible for the similar observations across the boundaries of distinctly different structures and/or deformation in western North America, including the Wyoming craton (Figure 16a,b). The scenario proposed in Figure 27b is consistent with the observed similar depths of the MLD in stable cratonic regions and the LAB in adjacent destroyed cratonic parts or tectonic regions (Figure 24, Chen, 2017;Thybo, 2006, and references therein).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 83%
“…That means that craton destruction would be temporarily and spatially ZHU ET AL. Wei et al (2015Wei et al ( , 2016; panel (b) is modified from Y. . The crustal and upper mantle velocity models in panel (c) are from Zheng et al (2017) and Xu et al (2018), respectively.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Extent Of Continental Reworkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subduction-collision-exhumation events of Paleoproterozoic orogenic tectonic development transported these high-pressure granulites and eclogites into the core crust (Zhang et al, 2019).Geophysical methods can effectively understand the current deep structures and the Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org tectonic processes. Several scholars have reported the strong concordance of surface topographic changes in the area and the E-W variations in the crustal and lithospheric structures (e.g., Chen, 2010;Cheng et al, 2013;Wei et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2017). NCC and several other cratons in the world have restructured as a result of subduction (Zhu et al, 2021), and the pre-existing structures in the lithosphere primarily control such continental reconfiguration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-dimensional velocity model is often used for seismic positioning, but the criteria and methods for selecting the model are different: the one-dimensional velocity model obtained by others is directly quoted or slightly adjusted [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], or inversion based on the existing velocity model to obtain a one-dimensional velocity model [ 7 ]. Due to the regional differences of geological structures, the one-dimensional velocity models in different regions are quite different, so it is necessary to conduct targeted case analysis on specific cases [ 8 ]. The accuracy of seismic positioning is highly dependent on the velocity model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%