2016
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2016.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Controls On Depositional Trends In Tidally Modified Deltas: Insights From Sequence Stratigraphic Correlation and Mapping of the Loyd And Sego Sandstones, Uinta And Piceance Basins of Utah and Colorado, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade or so, other detailed sedimentological studies on the Sego Sandstone have provided interpretations mostly in line with the previous literature, where depositional environments varied among deltas, estuaries and barrier systems, and with a strong emphasis on tidal or mixed tidal and wave processes (Burton et al, 2016;Burton & Wood, 2011;Painter et al, 2013;York et al, 2011). Recently, Rossi et al (2017) applied their quantitative method to two 8 m and 17 m thick sections of the lower Sego Sandstone based on the sedimentological logs from Legler et al (2014), concluding that these portions of the system varied between a tidedominated and wave-dominated classification, with varying degrees of influence by subordinate processes.…”
Section: Geological Background and Historical Views As A Strongly Tid...supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last decade or so, other detailed sedimentological studies on the Sego Sandstone have provided interpretations mostly in line with the previous literature, where depositional environments varied among deltas, estuaries and barrier systems, and with a strong emphasis on tidal or mixed tidal and wave processes (Burton et al, 2016;Burton & Wood, 2011;Painter et al, 2013;York et al, 2011). Recently, Rossi et al (2017) applied their quantitative method to two 8 m and 17 m thick sections of the lower Sego Sandstone based on the sedimentological logs from Legler et al (2014), concluding that these portions of the system varied between a tidedominated and wave-dominated classification, with varying degrees of influence by subordinate processes.…”
Section: Geological Background and Historical Views As A Strongly Tid...supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Studies interpreting similar systems became increasingly popular for rock units of different ages globally (Legler et al, 2013; McIlroy et al, 2005; Tänavsuu‐Milkeviciene & Plink‐Björklund, 2009). Although several open debates regarding the Sego remain—for example the general depositional environment, formational mechanisms of erosional surfaces, relationship with the Buck Tongue—there has been a wide and consistent agreement regarding the fundamental role of tidal process (alone or in combination with the wave process) during the accumulation of these deposits (Burton et al, 2016; Franczyk, 1989; Legler et al, 2014; Painter et al, 2013; van Cappelle et al, 2016; Willis, 2000; Willis & Gabel, 2001, 2003; York et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluvial influence is the key to differentiating wave‐dominated deltas from non‐deltaic shorefaces. Determination of fluvial influence, including quantitative analysis of river proportion and size of ancient systems (Hampson & Howell, ) requires detailed facies analysis, especially of the muddy deposits (Burton et al ., ; van Cappelle et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar ancient examples include the Upper Cretaceous Cliff House Sandstone (Donselaar, 1989;Olsen et al, 1999) and Hosta Tongue Sandstone (Sixsmith et al, 2008) of New Mexico, United States, the Upper Cretaceous Sego Sandstone of Utah and Colorado, United States (e.g., Gabel, 2001, 2003;Painter et al, 2013;Legler et al, 2014;Burton et al, 2016), and the Middle Jurassic Lajas Formation of the Neuquén Basin, westcentral Argentina (e.g., Rossi and Steel, 2016). In such coastal environments, process interaction is limited to the transition zones between the sections of process dominance (Rossi and Steel, 2016, Figures 20, 21), but the domains can shift through time, resulting in a successive mix of deposits in the rock record.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%