Diversity indices provide simple and powerful metrics for assessing biological communities. Based on entropy measures, the approach considers statistical and thermodynamic inferences to deduce ecological patterns. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of diversity indices. Because relative quantities depend on the sorting of organisms (e.g., guilds and species) and their interactions, field observations carry inherent imprecision, thus leading to misinterpretation. Here, we present a framework that is able to appropriately achieve the thermodynamic properties in ecological systems and ensure the inference power. We demonstrate that effective abundances rather than raw abundances provide a trustful estimator of probabilities, which is evaluated through massive tests. We use empirical and synthetic data to show the advantages and reliability of this new framework under a broad range of conditions. The tests demonstrate that the replication principle is always optimized by the new estimator. Compared to other methods, this approach is simpler and reduces the importance of schemes used for sorting organisms. We highlight the robustness and the valor of effective abundances for ecological contexts: i) to assess and monitor the biodiversity, ii) to define the best sorting of organisms according to maximum entropy principles, and iii) to link local to regional diversity (α-, β-, and γ-diversity).