Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles

Abstract

We analyze projected changes in climate extremes (extreme temperatures and heavy precipitation) in the multimodel ensembles of the fifth and sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP5 and CMIP6). The results reveal close similarity between both ensembles in the regional climate sensitivity of the projected multimodel mean changes in climate extremes, that is, their projected changes as a function of global warming. This stands in contrast to widely reported divergences in global (transient and equilibrium) climate sensitivity in the two multimodel ensembles. Some exceptions include higher warming in the South America monsoon region, lower warming in Southern Asia and Central Africa, and higher increases in heavy precipitation in Western Africa and the Sahel region in the CMIP6 ensemble. The multimodel spread in regional climate sensitivity is found to be large in both ensembles. In particular, it contributes more to intermodel spread in projected regional climate extremes compared with the intermodel spread in global climate sensitivity in CMIP6. Our results highlight the need to consider regional climate sensitivity as a distinct feature of Earth system models and a key determinant of projected regional impacts, which is largely independent of the models' response in global climate sensitivity. Plain Language Summary Many articles analyze and compare global climate sensitivity in climate models, that is, how their global warming differs at a given level of CO 2 concentrations. However, global warming is only one quantity affecting impacts. To assess human-and ecosystem-relevant impacts, it is essential to evaluate the regional climate sensitivity of climate models, that is, how their regional climate features differ at a given level of global warming. We analyze here regional climate sensitivity in the new multimodel ensemble that will underlie the conclusions of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This ensemble of model projections is called the "Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project" or CMIP6. We find that differences in regional climate sensitivity between models in CMIP6 often contribute more to the uncertainty of regional extremes projections than the uncertainty in global mean warming between models. Overall, the regional climate sensitivity features in the CMIP6 models' projections ensemble are very similar to those of the prior ensemble (CMIP5), although the model ensembles have been highlighted to differ in their global climate sensitivity over the 21st century.

The Climate Response to Emissions Reductions Due to COVID‐19: Initial Results From CovidMIP

“…• Quantifying changes in extremes. In addition to annual mean changes, the climate response in terms of extremes -such as daily maximum or minimum temperatures or daily precipitation rates -may also show important signals (Seneviratne and Hauser, 2020). • Influence on atmospheric circulation.…”

Storylines of the 2018 Northern Hemisphere heatwave at pre-industrial and higher global warming levels

“…Further, the increase in net shortwave radiation goes along with a decrease in latent heat flux and an increase in sensible heat flux, which is most pronounced in the warming40 scenario for CNA (not shown). This change in the surface fluxes implies a reduction in evaporative cooling and increase of near-surface heating, which can amplify the heatwave (Fischer et al, 2007;Seneviratne et al, 2006Seneviratne et al, , 2010. Hence, in a warmer climate the heatwaves during a NH2018-like event might be amplified through land-surface feedback.…”

“…Previous studies highlighted both the anomalous atmospheric circulation patterns during the event and the background global warming due to human greenhouse gas emissions as main drivers of the event (Drouard et al, 2019;Kornhuber et al, 2019b;Toreti et al, 2019;Vogel et al, 2019). The NH2018 event was characterized by a hemisphere-wide wavenumber 7 circulation pattern, which was also observed during the European heatwaves of 2003, 2006(Kornhuber et al, 2019b. A strong positive mode of the North Atlantic Oscillation contributed significantly to the extreme summer conditions in Europe by amplifying the weather anomalies induced by the wavenumber 7 pattern (Drouard et al, 2019).…”

Climate change risks to push one-third of global food production outside Safe Climatic Space

“…This would, however, require tools and models that are outside the scope of our approach. Further, many of these factors, such as future changes in climate variability and climate extremes, remain uncertain in global circulation models 48,49 and thus cannot yet be included in the analysis. Further, we acknowledge that using the food production distribution of 2010 limits the analysis on how future changes would impact on current production areas.…”