2005
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-5-119-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological applications: evaluation of uncertainties

Abstract: Abstract. The ERA15 Reanalysis (1979Reanalysis ( -1993 has been dynamically downscaled over Central Europe using 4 different regional climate models. The regional simulations were analysed with respect to 2m temperature and total precipitation, the main input parameters for hydrological applications. Model results were validated against three reference data sets (ERA15, CRU, DWD) and uncertainty ranges were derived. For mean annual 2m temperature over Germany, the simulation bias lies between −1.1 • C and +0.9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLM1 captures the very fine-scale variability of temperature because of its finer resolution of the orographic and land-surface gradients. As pointed out by Kotlarski et al (2005), the use of fine horizontal resolution is expected to allow more realistic representation of orographically controlled local meteorological features. 1970-1975 1991-2000 …”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLM1 captures the very fine-scale variability of temperature because of its finer resolution of the orographic and land-surface gradients. As pointed out by Kotlarski et al (2005), the use of fine horizontal resolution is expected to allow more realistic representation of orographically controlled local meteorological features. 1970-1975 1991-2000 …”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the precipitation, especially in mountainous areas, is affected by a systematic measurement bias, mainly caused by the deflection of the hydrometeors in the wind field above the gauge orifice and by the snow drift into the gauge that involves an undercatchment of precipitation [Frei and Schär, 1998]. Another problem for observations in areas with complex orography is the low-elevation station bias that is caused by the smaller number of stations at high altitudes [Kotlarski et al, 2005]. Some of these problems are relevant also for temperature, but they are especially critical for precipitation [Haslinger et al, 2013].…”
Section: The Observational Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive evaluations of RCMs have been undertaken over the EuroMediterranean region by applying evaluation metrics to mean values of precipitation (Déqué and Somot, 2010;Fisher et al, 2012;Jacob et al, 2007;Kjellström et al, 2010;Kotlarski et al, 2005) as well as focusing on extreme precipitation associated with hydrological floods (Frei et al, 2006;Fowler et al, 2007b;Herrera et al, 2010;Kysel et al, 2012;Maraun et al, 2012). For recent EMCORDEX models, initial evaluations over past periods have been conducted over Europe Katragkou et al, 2015;Kotlarski et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%