2002
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional analysis of hippocampal activation during memory encoding and retrieval: fMRI study

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Investigators have recently begun to examine the differential role of subregions of the hippocampus in episodic memory. Two distinct models have gained prominence in the field. A potential confounding factor in these fMRI studies, however, is that susceptibility artifact may differentially reduce signal in the anterior versus the posterior hippocampus. In the present study, we examined activation differences between hippocampal subregions during encoding and retrieval of words and interpreted our find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
125
2
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
12
125
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be kept in mind that technical factors may differentially influence fMRI and voxel-based volumetric measures for anterior vs. posterior portions of human hippocampus. fMRI susceptibility artefact and signal drop-out may affect the anterior medial temporal lobe more than posterior medial temporal lobe 82 (although protocols exist to correct this 83 ). In addition, posterior hippocampus is approximately half the cross-sectional area than the larger anterior hippocampal head, such that activated cluster size and degree of post-acquisition spatial smoothing may influence statistical effects differentially along the long-axis.…”
Section: Spatial Processing In Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be kept in mind that technical factors may differentially influence fMRI and voxel-based volumetric measures for anterior vs. posterior portions of human hippocampus. fMRI susceptibility artefact and signal drop-out may affect the anterior medial temporal lobe more than posterior medial temporal lobe 82 (although protocols exist to correct this 83 ). In addition, posterior hippocampus is approximately half the cross-sectional area than the larger anterior hippocampal head, such that activated cluster size and degree of post-acquisition spatial smoothing may influence statistical effects differentially along the long-axis.…”
Section: Spatial Processing In Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the debate about gradations of functions along the anterior-posterior axis of hippocampus (Lepage et al, 1998;Greicius et al, 2003;Poppenk et al, 2013;Strange et al, 2014), we tested for systematic variations of activity along this axis during the three phases of the WM task. For this purpose, the average activity of all voxels within hippocampus was calculated at all y-coordinates ranging from anterior to posterior (y ϭ Ϫ8 to Ϫ38) with a 2 mm resolution.…”
Section: Hippocampusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auditory cortex was partitioned into two ROIs (HG and PT). Also, given the debate about the differential function of anterior and posterior hippocampus (Lepage et al, 1998;Greicius et al, 2003), we divided the hippocampus ROI into anterior and posterior parts. From the frontal region, we chose IFG.…”
Section: Functional Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted the time activity curve using a sphere ROI with radius 6 mm centered around the peak coordinate for the bilateral posterior cingulate gyrus of 2/-51/27 (x/y/z) according to the study by Greicius et al (2003) (Greicius et al, 2003b). For bilateral hippocampus we used an ROI centered around Talairach-Tournoux coordinates (-)31/-12/-16 (x/y/z) covering the anterior aspect of the hippocampus ROIO used by a previous study (Greicius et al, 2003a). To include only grey matter areas into the ROIs, we masked the sphere ROIs by the grey matter map derived from the respective anatomical MRI scan in the MNI space using automatic segmentation based on a hidden Markov random field model and expectation maximization (Zhang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Regions Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%