2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/774/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region of validity of the Thomas–Fermi model with quantum, exchange and shell corrections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These corrections for TF theory are incorporated in QSM model. [21,22,29,31,[59][60][61] For the sake of comparison, iron and sodium shock Hugoniot are plotted in Fig. 21 The shell structures are evident and the values of pressure are different owing to Z and initial solid density values.…”
Section: Results Of Computation For Hugoniot Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These corrections for TF theory are incorporated in QSM model. [21,22,29,31,[59][60][61] For the sake of comparison, iron and sodium shock Hugoniot are plotted in Fig. 21 The shell structures are evident and the values of pressure are different owing to Z and initial solid density values.…”
Section: Results Of Computation For Hugoniot Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Efforts were made to develop more and more accurate detailed descriptions of ionic as well as electronic parts of EOS. [16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32] The EOS data are primarily consists of contributions from electrons and ions along with those from cold part solids, i.e., empirical calculations for pressure and energy at T = 0 K. There are separate models for calculating electronic and ionic contributions. In this paper, the EOS model is developed in comparison to electronic contributions from I-SHML model [26,33] and ionic contributions from Cowan model, whereas the cold part contributions are obtained from the scaled binding energy model (SBEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation