2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1413-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region Extraction and Classification of Skin Cancer: A Heterogeneous framework of Deep CNN Features Fusion and Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work was assessed on three well-established publicly available datasets PH2, ISBI 2017 Skin Lesion Challenge (SLC) and ISIC 2019 (SLC). We evaluated our proposed segmentation method against segmentation frameworks based on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) [ 57 ], approaches with U-nets followed by histogram equalization and C-means clustering [ 58 ], segmentation done by crowdsourcing from ISIC 2017 challenge results [ 59 ], simultaneous segmentation and classification using bootstrapping deep convolutional neural network model [ 60 ], segmentation using contrast stretching and mean deviation [ 61 ] and semantic segmentation method for automatic segmentation [ 62 ]. In addition, we also drew inspiration from few of the most successful lesion segmentation methods introduced in the recent years like segmentation by means of FCN networks, multi stage fully convolution network (FCN) with parallel integration (mFCN-PI) [ 63 , 64 ], FrCN method involving simultaneous segmentation and classification, a fully-convolutional residual networks (FCRN), which was an amendment and extension of FCN architecture [ 65 , 66 , 67 ], a deep fully convolutional-deconvolutional neural network (CDNN) performing automatic segmentation [ 68 ] and lastly with the semi automatic Grab cut algorithm [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work was assessed on three well-established publicly available datasets PH2, ISBI 2017 Skin Lesion Challenge (SLC) and ISIC 2019 (SLC). We evaluated our proposed segmentation method against segmentation frameworks based on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) [ 57 ], approaches with U-nets followed by histogram equalization and C-means clustering [ 58 ], segmentation done by crowdsourcing from ISIC 2017 challenge results [ 59 ], simultaneous segmentation and classification using bootstrapping deep convolutional neural network model [ 60 ], segmentation using contrast stretching and mean deviation [ 61 ] and semantic segmentation method for automatic segmentation [ 62 ]. In addition, we also drew inspiration from few of the most successful lesion segmentation methods introduced in the recent years like segmentation by means of FCN networks, multi stage fully convolution network (FCN) with parallel integration (mFCN-PI) [ 63 , 64 ], FrCN method involving simultaneous segmentation and classification, a fully-convolutional residual networks (FCRN), which was an amendment and extension of FCN architecture [ 65 , 66 , 67 ], a deep fully convolutional-deconvolutional neural network (CDNN) performing automatic segmentation [ 68 ] and lastly with the semi automatic Grab cut algorithm [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horie et al [24] demonstrated the diagnostic capability of deep learning techniques like CNN for esophageal cancer, which included squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with a sensitivity of 98%. [25] Saba, Tanzila, et al proposed an automated cascaded design for skin lesion detection, which consisted of three significant steps, namely, contrast stretching and boundary extraction using CNN, and finally extracting depth features using transferred learning. Sekaran, Kaushik, et al [26] proposed a model deployed using a convolutional neural network to isolate infected images from healthy ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-trained model parameters are updated based on the customized (new) dataset. Researches are using TL concept along with fine-tuning of existing CNN models for medical image classification and disease detection 43 , 44 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%