2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region-Based Association Analysis of Human Quantitative Traits in Related Individuals

Abstract: Regional-based association analysis instead of individual testing of each SNP was introduced in genome-wide association studies to increase the power of gene mapping, especially for rare genetic variants. For regional association tests, the kernel machine-based regression approach was recently proposed as a more powerful alternative to collapsing-based methods. However, the vast majority of existing algorithms and software for the kernel machine-based regression are applicable only to unrelated samples. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 The GenABEL R package was used to eliminate the effect of relatedness from the trait. Corrected environmental residuals were estimated according to the formula: trait~sex +age+genomic kinship using the GRAMMAR+ method 36 as implemented in the GenABEL 1.7-2. MixABEL 35 was used for running the linear regressions between the estimated residuals and all the imputed SNPs.…”
Section: Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The GenABEL R package was used to eliminate the effect of relatedness from the trait. Corrected environmental residuals were estimated according to the formula: trait~sex +age+genomic kinship using the GRAMMAR+ method 36 as implemented in the GenABEL 1.7-2. MixABEL 35 was used for running the linear regressions between the estimated residuals and all the imputed SNPs.…”
Section: Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical and horizontal dashed lines represent the Bonferroni corrected 5% significance threshold in ordinary GWAS and 5% threshold for the exact p-values, respectively. (A) A binary (case-control) trait was simulated in each replicate, and P gwa was obtained via the procedure in GenABEL; (B) A normally distributed trait was simulated, and P gwa was obtained using the procedure in GenABEL , with GRAMMAR+ ( from ; Belonogova et al ., 2013) transformed phenotype to control for population stratification.…”
Section: Examples and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the genes that passed this threshold, a random set of 200 traits was selected. For each of these traits, GWA were performed in two hundred permuted datasets where GRAMMAR+ transformed residuals (Belonogova, Svishcheva et al 2013, Forsberg, Andreatta et al 2015) were used as phenotype, resulting in 40,000 permutations in total. Based on this total distribution, we derived a 1% significance threshold (-log 10 (p-value) = 6.84).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%