2020
DOI: 10.1177/0163443720907535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regimes of temporality: China, Tibet and the politics of time in the post-2008 era

Abstract: While the politics of time are an important dimension of Chinese state discourse about Tibet, it remains insufficiently explored in theoretical and practical terms. This article examines the written and visual discourses of Tibetan temporality across Chinese state media in the post-2008 era. It analyses how these media discourses attempt to construct a ‘regime of temporality’ in order to manage public opinion about Tibet and consolidate Chinese rule over the region. While the expansion of online technologies h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rhetorician Jeannie Beard (2020) has aptly pointed out that regardless of where it happens, "when people can be cancelled for differing opinions, a toxic environment is created, one of oppression, suppression, and false consensus." CCPCC clearly meets yet far exceeds such definitions of cancel culture, in that it is globally deployed by the CCP with the purpose of "constraining, excluding and undermining alternative narratives … that contradict those of the state" (Kehoe 2020(Kehoe : 1142; it demands adherence as a prerequisite for access to China's market. These nuanced differences and their impacts on Asian democracy activists should not be overlooked-particularly, as we will see below, their impacts on the alternative political narratives these activists are generating with the use of hashtags.…”
Section: The Geopolitics Of "Ccp Cancel Culture"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhetorician Jeannie Beard (2020) has aptly pointed out that regardless of where it happens, "when people can be cancelled for differing opinions, a toxic environment is created, one of oppression, suppression, and false consensus." CCPCC clearly meets yet far exceeds such definitions of cancel culture, in that it is globally deployed by the CCP with the purpose of "constraining, excluding and undermining alternative narratives … that contradict those of the state" (Kehoe 2020(Kehoe : 1142; it demands adherence as a prerequisite for access to China's market. These nuanced differences and their impacts on Asian democracy activists should not be overlooked-particularly, as we will see below, their impacts on the alternative political narratives these activists are generating with the use of hashtags.…”
Section: The Geopolitics Of "Ccp Cancel Culture"mentioning
confidence: 99%