2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818317000169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regime Types and Terrorism

Abstract: Regime type has opposing effects on terrorism. If a regime constrains the executive branch, then terrorism may be more prevalent. If, however, a regime allows all viewpoints to be represented, then grievances may be held in check, resulting in less terrorism. Regimes that value constituents' lives and property will also act to limit attacks. We formulate a game-theoretic model, containing a terrorist group and targeted government, that captures these opposing forces and supports a nonlinear relationship betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
105
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
10
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Behind this underpinning is the logic that, in so far as citizens have peaceful channels by which conflicts can be resolved at their disposal, options of terrorism are less likely to be considered as means to conflict settlement. This is consistent with some studies which have established that "weakly institutionalized" or "immature" democracies with less institutionalized minority protection and substantial violations in human rights create a favorable environment for terrorism (Gaibulloev et al, 2017). In the light of this postulation, we expect countries with better political governance to be less affected by terrorism because they offer peaceful mechanisms for the settlement of politico-economic scores.…”
Section: Linkage Between Political Governance/stability and Terrorismsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Behind this underpinning is the logic that, in so far as citizens have peaceful channels by which conflicts can be resolved at their disposal, options of terrorism are less likely to be considered as means to conflict settlement. This is consistent with some studies which have established that "weakly institutionalized" or "immature" democracies with less institutionalized minority protection and substantial violations in human rights create a favorable environment for terrorism (Gaibulloev et al, 2017). In the light of this postulation, we expect countries with better political governance to be less affected by terrorism because they offer peaceful mechanisms for the settlement of politico-economic scores.…”
Section: Linkage Between Political Governance/stability and Terrorismsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Most of the bombings in Afghanistan and Iraq following 9/11 are not included in the standard event data sets. For 1970-2012, Gaibulloev, Piazza, and Sandler (2017) indicate that 70 percent of all terrorist attacks occurred in countries that did not experience a civil conflict.…”
Section: Terrorism Insurgency and Civil Warmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gaibulloev, Piazza, and Sandler () and Younas and Sandler () adopt the measure of transnational terrorism constructed by Enders et al. ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%