The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.21836/pem20130208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regenerative and innovative joint medication in the horse – Part 2: Efficacy and adverse effects of joint medication in the horse - A review of the literature - The pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in the horse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several novel treatments based on biological processes rather than providing mere pain control have recently been introduced, but the demonstration of efficacy has been difficult (Broeckx et al 2019). The use of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IRAP ® ), cell-based procedures such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and the transplantation of mesenchymal stem-cells have not proven useful for the treatment of degenerative joint disease in horses (Bertone et al 2014, Ehrle et al 2013, Fahie et al 2013, Franklin and Cook 2013. In the daily use, they are often viewed critically (Hildner et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several novel treatments based on biological processes rather than providing mere pain control have recently been introduced, but the demonstration of efficacy has been difficult (Broeckx et al 2019). The use of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IRAP ® ), cell-based procedures such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and the transplantation of mesenchymal stem-cells have not proven useful for the treatment of degenerative joint disease in horses (Bertone et al 2014, Ehrle et al 2013, Fahie et al 2013, Franklin and Cook 2013. In the daily use, they are often viewed critically (Hildner et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%