2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration of Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata) and limber pine (Pinus flexilis) three decades after stand-replacing fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Limber pine seedlings occurred more often with noncompeting ground cover types, litter, and rock and less often with grass than in random areas, which is consistent with the results of Jones (1967), Schoettle (2009), andLooney andWaring (2012). Grass was also negatively associated with limber pine seedling density.…”
Section: Ground Cover and Microsite Objectssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Limber pine seedlings occurred more often with noncompeting ground cover types, litter, and rock and less often with grass than in random areas, which is consistent with the results of Jones (1967), Schoettle (2009), andLooney andWaring (2012). Grass was also negatively associated with limber pine seedling density.…”
Section: Ground Cover and Microsite Objectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A variation in density exists between the studies because counted seedling clumps as one unit (seedling sites) and we differentiated individual stems, even if clumped. Our mean seedling densities for study areas on the Front Range of Colorado (96 and 194 stems ha Ϫ1 ) are very low in comparison with studies of limber pine regeneration in existing stands lacking recent fire (492 stems ha Ϫ1 ) and sites postfire on the Front Range of Colorado, which range from 290 to 508 stems ha Ϫ1 (Shankman andDaly 1988, Coop andSchoettle 2009). Overstory basal area and density of live limber pine Ն1.37 m tall in the same evaluated plots as in this study were 5.8 m 2 ha Ϫ1 and 311 stems ha Ϫ1 , which were also low in R 2 value obtained using PROC REG with /best ϭ 5 selection ϭ rsquare b, and applies only to the fixed effects.…”
Section: Seedling Densitycontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of abiotic shelter elements can potentially provide safe microsite conditions for recruitment, without producing competition dynamics with the seedlings. Nurse objects can enhance both seedling establishment and survival (Coop and Schoettle, 2009;Resler et al, 2005;Castro et al, 2011). They can efficiently act as traps for wind-dispersed seed, and provide shading, resulting in reduced evaporation and higher soil moisture (Flores and Jurado, 2003;Carlucci et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%