2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration of Polylepis australis Bitt. in the mountains of central Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
48
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
48
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They include both climatic factors such as temperature, humidity and radiation regimes during the growing season, and soil factors such as soil moisture, depth of the humus layer and soil texture, which affect water and nutrient availability at the soil surface and in the soil horizon (Rojo and Montero 1996). Topography, which influences temperature and water regimes (Madsen and Larsen 1997), understory cover (Dobrowolska 1998;Kitzberger 2000) and the formation of a soil seed bank (Enrico et al 2004) also significantly affect the establishment and survival of tree seedlings. The impact of herbivores (Paluch 2005), pathogens (Auspurguer 1983) and competition with grass (De Steven 1991) can hinder regeneration success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include both climatic factors such as temperature, humidity and radiation regimes during the growing season, and soil factors such as soil moisture, depth of the humus layer and soil texture, which affect water and nutrient availability at the soil surface and in the soil horizon (Rojo and Montero 1996). Topography, which influences temperature and water regimes (Madsen and Larsen 1997), understory cover (Dobrowolska 1998;Kitzberger 2000) and the formation of a soil seed bank (Enrico et al 2004) also significantly affect the establishment and survival of tree seedlings. The impact of herbivores (Paluch 2005), pathogens (Auspurguer 1983) and competition with grass (De Steven 1991) can hinder regeneration success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher G ST and PhiPT values among populations of juveniles relative to adults, as well as some degree of structure between age classes, could be explained N is the number of individuals per population, H T is the total genetic diversity for the species, H S is the mean within-population genetic diversity, G ST is the proportion of the total genetic diversity found among populations a Original 12 populations corresponding to the 12 forest patches sampled b The 12 populations sampled pooled across populations, within watershed by the very patchy occurrence of seedlings, with most of them restricted to relatively few canopy gaps (S. Aragundi personal observation, Enrico et al 2004). As a result, the seedlings sampled may have been progeny of relatively few widely scattered adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of such structure in populations of mature individuals is consistent with theoretical predictions for tree populations which are characterized by generally low genetic structure (Hamrick andGodt 1989, 1996;Nybom 2004). High seedling mortality (observed in Polylepis incana, P. pauta, [Cierjacks et al 2007], and P. australis [Enrico et al 2004]) and delayed reproductive maturity in trees could contribute to the attenuation of structure over time (Austerlitz et al 2000;Le Corre and Kramer 2003). No correlation was found between geographic distance and genetic differentiation, and clustering of populations on the basis of genetic affinity often revealed higher genetic similarity between populations in different basins, which may have been caused by greater gene exchange between river basins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, diameter distribution suggests poor sapling recruitment as stems of diameter class 0-10 cm represented only less than 50% of the overall stem number at all altitudinal levels. Studies of Enrico et al (2004) on woodlands of P. australis in Argentina, describe comparable diameter distribution patterns. Such population structures within forest stands are typical for shade-intolerant species that do not successfully regenerate below a closed canopy (e.g.…”
Section: Impact Of Tramplingmentioning
confidence: 92%