2021
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2021.2005133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration failure of Scots pine changes the species composition of young forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birch is distributed evenly across the country, but in lower densities (about 10%-15%) [23]. The browsing of ungulates, namely moose (Alces alces L.), roe deer (Capreolus L.), red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and fallow deer (Dama dama L.) are believed to be the main driver of the "sprucification" of southern Sweden, as a result of failing regenerations with Scots pine and broadleaved tree species [29][30][31].…”
Section: The Study Areas and Local Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Birch is distributed evenly across the country, but in lower densities (about 10%-15%) [23]. The browsing of ungulates, namely moose (Alces alces L.), roe deer (Capreolus L.), red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and fallow deer (Dama dama L.) are believed to be the main driver of the "sprucification" of southern Sweden, as a result of failing regenerations with Scots pine and broadleaved tree species [29][30][31].…”
Section: The Study Areas and Local Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birch is distributed evenly across the country, but in lower densities (about 10%-15%) [23]. The browsing of ungulates, namely moose (Alces alces L.), roe deer (Capreolus L.), red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and fallow deer (Dama dama L.) are believed to be the main driver of the "sprucification" of southern Sweden, as a result of failing regenerations with Scots pine and broadleaved tree species [29][30][31]. Most productive forests in Kronoberg County are owned by family forest owners (78%), while the forests in Västerbotten County have a mixed ownership structure (40% is owned by family forest owners, 31% by the state and 23% by private forest companies) [23].…”
Section: The Study Areas and Local Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norway spruce canopy is not only denser than Scots pine canopy (Goude et al 2019), but the branches of Norway spruce descend lower down the trunk which may also provide an additional physical barrier, limiting lichen diaspore establishment and growth (Kuusinen 1996b;Lie et al 2009). Furthermore, the stands of Norway spruce located in southern Sweden are often more densely planted than for instance in northern Sweden (Ara et al 2021). This is known to limit the development of understorey vascular plants, bryophytes and terricolous lichens (Hedwall et al 2010;Petersson et al 2019Petersson et al , 2021.…”
Section: Canopy and Light Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are at the moment quite expensive. Evaluating the VOI when a certain within-stand variation is expected after thinning might become an important aspect for management in the future as the tree species composition in normal production forests is likely to change favoring mixtures of conifers and deciduous tree species (Ara, Barbeito, Kalén, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The young forests of today help us understand what forest we can expect in a few years at the start of the thinning phase. Ara, Barbeito, Kalén, et al (2021) used nationwide ÄBIN data (survey of moose browsing), covering young forest (1 -4 m in height), to study the regeneration success of Scots pine stands or Norway spruce stands. They found that the dominance of the regeneration species deviated from the intended: for Scots pine only 30-35% of the stands had 1500 trees ha -1 or more and for the Norway spruce, about 60% of the stands had 1500 trees ha -1 or more.…”
Section: Within-stand Variation Before Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%