The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech.

Abstract: Two experiments in which time was restored to artificially accelerated (time-compressed) speech are reported. Experiment 1 showed that although both young and older adults' recall of the speech benefited from the restoration of time, time restoration failed to boost the older adults to their baseline levels for unaltered speech. In Experiment 2, either 100% or 125% of lost time was restored by inserting pauses, either at linguistic boundaries or at random points within the passages. Experiment 2 showed that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
81
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we focus on the time course of language comprehension here, it is most straightforward to describe differences in young and old in terms of processing speed. Our use of this term is certainly consistent with accounts of slowing in cognitive aging (Salthouse, 1996) and with many characterizations of older adults as having slowed language processing abilities (e.g., Hale & Myerson, 1995;Myerson, Ferraro, Hale, & Lima, 1992;Stine & Hindman, 1994;Wingfield, Tun, Koh, & Rosen, 1999), but for now we leave open the possibility that speed changes could stem from or cause other changes, such as inhibitory ability. We return to these issues in the General Discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Because we focus on the time course of language comprehension here, it is most straightforward to describe differences in young and old in terms of processing speed. Our use of this term is certainly consistent with accounts of slowing in cognitive aging (Salthouse, 1996) and with many characterizations of older adults as having slowed language processing abilities (e.g., Hale & Myerson, 1995;Myerson, Ferraro, Hale, & Lima, 1992;Stine & Hindman, 1994;Wingfield, Tun, Koh, & Rosen, 1999), but for now we leave open the possibility that speed changes could stem from or cause other changes, such as inhibitory ability. We return to these issues in the General Discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The pauses improved listeners' comprehension. This benefit only arose if pauses were at linguistically appropriate locations in the speech signal (not at random or uniform locations), and the benefit leveled off once the pauses had increased the duration of the whole recording back to its original length before the artificial speeding process [21]. Two explanations for this link between comprehension and the presence of pauses at linguisticallyappropriate locations in speech were proposed: (1) pauses may help listeners more easily determine sentence/clause boundaries in the performance or (2) pauses at appropriate phrase boundaries give the listener some additional time to mentally "chunk" units of information and process/remember them more effectively.…”
Section: Motivations and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study increased the speed of an English speech recording, and researchers later inserted pauses at linguistically appropriate locations (between sentences, between clauses, between phrases) [21]. The pauses improved listeners' comprehension.…”
Section: Motivations and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that older adults are differentially affected by time compression of speech in comparison with younger adults (Gordon-Salant & Fitzgibbons, 1993;Wingfield, Tun, Koh, & Rosen, 1999). As such, one would expect to see the overall height of older listeners' intelligibility curves to be especially affected by rapid speech.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%