“…Furthermore, systemic discrimination towards a range of protected characteristics impacts upon academic fieldwork as it is those in positions of power within the institution who are the gatekeepers and policy‐makers; and most institutional gatekeeping and policy‐making fails to consider intersectionality (Bhakta, 2020; Miles et al, 2017). In equality agendas all too often gender is considered as the sole axis of marginalisation (Johnson, 2020) or, worse still, conflated with race such that white women have seen a meteoric rise in representation, power and status in the academy (Bhopal & Henderson, 2019) whilst their LGBTQ+, disabled and ethnic minority counterparts, be they male, female, non‐binary or any other gender identity, continue to be under‐represented (Núñez et al, 2019). Expectations of sustained excellence (Gourlay & Stevenson, 2017; Moore et al, 2017) and the intense and seemingly relentless demands of contemporary academic employment (Gill, 2010; Morrish, 2019) can also translate into taught fieldwork, rendering it a focal point of distress and ‘ordeal’ for staff from under‐represented groups (Tucker & Horton, 2019).…”