Handbook of Philosophical Logic 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0479-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refutation Systems in Propositional Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that, at any stage of this process, if the answer to a certain question is negative (that is, one cannot refute formula(s) concerned by the question), then the answer to the previous question must be 4 The difference between the notion of refutability considered here and the one known from the tradition of refutation systems (see e.g. [22]) is clear in this context, as one can have p and ¬p refuted in a refutation system (both are non-theses), but one cannot have them both falsified under the same valuation. In other words, the rules of refutation systems preserve non-validity, whereas the rules presented in this paper preserve-as we shall see-falsifiability under a valuation.…”
Section: An Erotetic Account Of Dual Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that, at any stage of this process, if the answer to a certain question is negative (that is, one cannot refute formula(s) concerned by the question), then the answer to the previous question must be 4 The difference between the notion of refutability considered here and the one known from the tradition of refutation systems (see e.g. [22]) is clear in this context, as one can have p and ¬p refuted in a refutation system (both are non-theses), but one cannot have them both falsified under the same valuation. In other words, the rules of refutation systems preserve non-validity, whereas the rules presented in this paper preserve-as we shall see-falsifiability under a valuation.…”
Section: An Erotetic Account Of Dual Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, normal forms based on clausal forms (see [4,6]) are more useful. They are both simple and general.…”
Section: Refutation Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, axiom systems are notoriously bad for proof search. And so are refutation systems containing the rules: R s and R L mp (although they have some interesting theoretical aspects (see [5,6])). However, the rule R d is more promising for proof search (or, rather, refutation search).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, different approaches to the problem of decision procedure for S5 were proposed on the ground of tableau methods (Kripke [15], Zeman [36], Fitting [9], Goré [11]), refutation metods (Skura [30]), resolution (Farinas del Cerro and Herzig [8]) or application of normal forms. Tableau-based approaches are quite close to approaches based on (cut-free) SC and may be essentially treated as belonging to the same group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%