2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refugia-Based Strategies for Parasite Control in Livestock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When anthelmintics were applied, the proportion of total stock treated varied, with only 38% of farmers reporting to have mass drenched 100% of their stock, whereas the majority (62%) incorporated a more selective approach to administering anthelmintics: that is, 6% drenched 80%–90%, 20% drenched 50%–70%, 13% drenched 20%–40% and 23% drenched less than 10% of stock. Targeting anthelmintic treatments to animals at risk, most heavily infected and symptomatic animals have, for example, proven to be a particularly effective means to reduce anthelmintic inputs against widespread GIN infections in sheep and to a lesser extent cattle, while slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistance and delivering epidemiological and production benefits 6–9 . However, data to support this approach in other livestock species, and/or against other helminth infections, are lacking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When anthelmintics were applied, the proportion of total stock treated varied, with only 38% of farmers reporting to have mass drenched 100% of their stock, whereas the majority (62%) incorporated a more selective approach to administering anthelmintics: that is, 6% drenched 80%–90%, 20% drenched 50%–70%, 13% drenched 20%–40% and 23% drenched less than 10% of stock. Targeting anthelmintic treatments to animals at risk, most heavily infected and symptomatic animals have, for example, proven to be a particularly effective means to reduce anthelmintic inputs against widespread GIN infections in sheep and to a lesser extent cattle, while slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistance and delivering epidemiological and production benefits 6–9 . However, data to support this approach in other livestock species, and/or against other helminth infections, are lacking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our survey found evidence of BZ resistance at all farms where TST was practised and of IVM resistance at half of the farms and detected dual resistance. The choice of treatment indicator, however, is crucial for the e cacy of TST [53,54]. Czech farmers traditionally select animals for drenching based on faecal consistency (diarrhoea), but this indicator is unreliable for TST in goats [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our survey found evidence of BZ resistance at all farms where TST was practised and of IVM resistance at half of the farms and detected multiple resistance. The choice of treatment indicator, however, is crucial for the e cacy of TST [51,52]. Czech farmers traditionally select animals for drenching based on faecal consistency (diarrhoea), but this indicator is unreliable for TST in goats [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%