2017
DOI: 10.1670/15-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refugia and Speciation in North American Scarlet Snakes (Cemophora)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, effective migration across the entire P. melanoleucus range appears to be moderate, with even slightly increased effective migration in parts of South Carolina and Florida. These results contrast previous squamate phylogeography studies (Burbrink, Fontanella, Pyron, Guiher, & Jimenez, 2008; Burbrink et al, 2000; Weinell & Austin, 2017, Myers et al, 2020) which tend to show substantial genetic variation between populations and clade memberships occurring on opposite sides of different river drainages. Discord among results from our phylogenetic and population genomic structuring analyses compared to other squamate taxa within the Eastern Nearctic may feasibly be underpinned by the dispersal capabilities of these species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather, effective migration across the entire P. melanoleucus range appears to be moderate, with even slightly increased effective migration in parts of South Carolina and Florida. These results contrast previous squamate phylogeography studies (Burbrink, Fontanella, Pyron, Guiher, & Jimenez, 2008; Burbrink et al, 2000; Weinell & Austin, 2017, Myers et al, 2020) which tend to show substantial genetic variation between populations and clade memberships occurring on opposite sides of different river drainages. Discord among results from our phylogenetic and population genomic structuring analyses compared to other squamate taxa within the Eastern Nearctic may feasibly be underpinned by the dispersal capabilities of these species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Eastern Nearctic is a large biogeographic region that spans much of North America and harbors multiple biodiversity hotspots and several well-known biogeographic barriers that reduce gene flow among populations of different species in predictable ways (Burbrink & Guiher, 2015;Burbrink, Lawson, & Slowinski, 2000;McKelvy & Burbrink, 2017;Myers, McKelvy, & Burbrink, 2020). As such, previous studies have shown that the population genomic structure of squamate reptiles within this region tends to correlate with the Apalachicola and Mississippi river drainages (Alexander Burbrink et al, 2000;Weinell & Austin, 2017). However, the impacts of biogeographic heterogeneity on population genetic structure may be taxon specific (as reviewed by Soltis et al, 2006), depending on species range distributions, genetic diversity, and overall vagility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparisons led Williams and Wilson (1967) to hypothesize that C. ( c. ) lineri was more closely related to the more geographically distant C. c. coccinea than to the nearer C. c. copei , which they attributed to climactic conditions that led to a splitting of C. coccinea during the Pleistocene. Weinell and Austin (2017) proposed elevating the subspecies to C. lineri based on their genetic analysis; that analysis indicated that C. lineri diverged from the C. coccinea in the Pliocene or early Pleistocene and that C. lineri is monophyletic, while C. c. coccinea and C. c. copei are paraphyletic. Crother et al (2017) and other taxonomic sources adopted that taxonomy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their genetic work, Weinell and Austin (2017) performed a phenotypic analysis of five southern Texas specimens (including the NPI specimen: TNHC 86866) and the two specimens used by Williams et al (1966) in the original description. In rough concurrence with Williams et al (1966) , they found that C. lineri differed most distinctly from C. coccinea in the number of VSR (178–195; x̄ = 186.1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the south‐eastern USA, scarlet kingsnakes ( Lampropeltis elapsoides ) and scarlet snakes ( Cemophora coccinea ) mimic eastern coral snakes ( Micrurus fulvius ). In the southcentral USA, Western milk snakes ( Lampropeltis gentilis ), C. coccinea , and the recently described Texas scarlet snake ( Cemophora lineri ; Weinell & Austin, ) mimic Texas coral snakes ( Micrurus tener ). All of the C. coccinea and C. lineri that co‐occurred with M. tener were considered to be one mimic (Western C. coccinea ) as the two species do not differ in any mimetic traits and share the same model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%