2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-008-9125-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refuge or Rehabilitation? Assessing the Development of a Women’s Empowerment Center for People with Severe Mental Illness

Abstract: Recent calls for psychiatric services to focus upon psychosocial recovery for people with severe mental illness has led to a renewed interest in recovery communities. Hence, Community Connections (Washington DC) set up a Women's Empowerment Center as an intentional recovery community. The aim of this paper is to qualitatively chronicle the development of this center to assess emerging challenges. Focus groups and participant observation were conducted regularly over a 16-month period. Analysis suggested three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given pejorative attitudes toward the mentally ill, we might consider them to be members of an oppressed group. And Freire’s work has served as the theoretical foundation for studies of adults with mental illness, emphasizing mutual support via study circles (Whitney et al, 2008), as well as critical reflection on storytelling accompanied by visual images (Mizock et al, 2014; Potash et al, 2018). Within the APFU group, interactions were most certainly dialogic in nature with no single person serving as “teacher.” The group never emphasized common political difficulties or taking action in the world in ways that promoted change.…”
Section: Framing the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given pejorative attitudes toward the mentally ill, we might consider them to be members of an oppressed group. And Freire’s work has served as the theoretical foundation for studies of adults with mental illness, emphasizing mutual support via study circles (Whitney et al, 2008), as well as critical reflection on storytelling accompanied by visual images (Mizock et al, 2014; Potash et al, 2018). Within the APFU group, interactions were most certainly dialogic in nature with no single person serving as “teacher.” The group never emphasized common political difficulties or taking action in the world in ways that promoted change.…”
Section: Framing the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frueh and colleagues have suggested, for instance a multicomponent cognitive-behavioral intervention for persons with SMI, including education, anxiety management, social skills training and exposure therapy [36]. Similarly, Harris and colleagues have modified their trauma recovery and empowerment approach to meet the needs of patients with SMI [37,38]. This 33-week program includes group psychoeducation, reframing, problem solving, addressing the trauma directly with aims toward developing sense of validation, self-trust and competence.…”
Section: Treatment For Trauma Among Individuals With Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US, older ''clubhouse models'' were designed to connect their ''members'' with the broader community, and seemed to help people feel ''less lonely'' (Stein, Barry, van Dien, Hollingsworth, & Sweeney, 1999), but offered little in terms of the employment, education, housing, spirituality, social relations, and recreational activities service users find essential for recovery (Slade, 2010). Researchers have Myers further observed that older clubhouse models provided refuge rather than rehabilitation (Whitley, Harris, & Anglin, 2008), and that in the long term, they can become ''isolated havens'' that foster a ''service-dependent lifestyle'' (Whitley, Strickler, & Drake, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%