2013
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences

Abstract: The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Reference Sequence (RefSeq) database is a collection of annotated genomic, transcript and protein sequence records derived from data in public sequence archives and from computation, curation and collaboration (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/). We report here on growth of the mammalian and human subsets, changes to NCBI’s eukaryotic annotation pipeline and modifications affecting transcript and protein records. Recent changes to NCBI’s eukaryotic gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
832
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 897 publications
(836 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
832
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…iberiensis and C‐lineage individuals using the training data set. To uncover the putative functional role of the highly differentiated SNPs, we used SNPeff 4.3 (Cingolani et al., 2012) and the NCBI honeybee annotation version 102 (Pruitt et al., 2013). Subsequently, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis in the DAVID v.8.0 database (Huang, Sherman, & Lempicki, 2009) considering the GO terms of the biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC) (Gene Ontology Consortium, 2015) and the KEGG pathway (Kanehisa, Sato, Kawashima, Furumichi, & Tanabe, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iberiensis and C‐lineage individuals using the training data set. To uncover the putative functional role of the highly differentiated SNPs, we used SNPeff 4.3 (Cingolani et al., 2012) and the NCBI honeybee annotation version 102 (Pruitt et al., 2013). Subsequently, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis in the DAVID v.8.0 database (Huang, Sherman, & Lempicki, 2009) considering the GO terms of the biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC) (Gene Ontology Consortium, 2015) and the KEGG pathway (Kanehisa, Sato, Kawashima, Furumichi, & Tanabe, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant information was gathered from population databases (Exome Aggregation Consortium 14 , Exome Variant server 15 , 1000 Genomes 16 , dbSNP 17 and dbVAR 18 ), disease databases (humsavar.txt release 2016_05 19 , ClinVar 20 , HGMD-public 21 , OMIM 22 and OMIA 23 ) and sequence databases (RefSeqGene 24 , NCBI Genome 25 , UCSC Genome 26 and Ensembl Genome 27 ). I-Mutant2.0 28 was used as a predictor of protein stability changes upon variations.…”
Section: Bioinformatics Tools For Sequence Variant Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 When the nucleotide position is indicated, the GenBank cDNA reference sequences were used as follows: AIPL1 (NG_008474.1); CEP290 (NG_008417.1); CRB1 (NG_008483.1); GUCY2D (NG_009092.1); LRAT (NG_009110.1); RDH12 (NG_008321.1); RPE65 (NG_008472.1); RPGRIP1 (NG_008933.1); and TULP1 (NG_009077.1). 31 …”
Section: Sequence Variants Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%