1994
DOI: 10.2307/258939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing the Organization: Why Implementing Total Quality is Easier Said Than Done

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
250
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
250
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…They focused on general issues like definitions of TQM and the identification and quantification of the benefits of TQM. A central issue was how to successfully implement TQM (e.g., Hunt, 1992;Reger et al, 1994). The implementation of TQM is perceived as difficult, as it requires the firm to move from its traditional hierarchical and functional organization to horizontal, cross-functional processes.…”
Section: Total Quality Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They focused on general issues like definitions of TQM and the identification and quantification of the benefits of TQM. A central issue was how to successfully implement TQM (e.g., Hunt, 1992;Reger et al, 1994). The implementation of TQM is perceived as difficult, as it requires the firm to move from its traditional hierarchical and functional organization to horizontal, cross-functional processes.…”
Section: Total Quality Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational identity has until now been pointed out as hindering changes such as organizational reform and new technology implementation (Reger, Gustafson, Demarie, & Mullane, 1994;Sato, 2015;Tripsas, 2009). At the same time, however, organizational identity can also be seen as creating temporal continuity in decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to other research in organisation contexts (e.g., Bartunek, 1984;Harris, 1994;Labianca et al, 2000;Poole et al, 1989;Reger, Gustafson, Demarie, & Mullane, 1994;Reger & Palmer, 1996), crisis may trigger alterations in schema contents. During this time, common activities and sense making of HRM might go through disequilibrium or a cognitive conflict, which, in turn, acts as leverage for HRM schema change.…”
Section: Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%