1998
DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.13.1034-jms0401-2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing the Geriatric Patient

Abstract: Pulse is prepared by the Pulse editors and JAMA staff and is published monthly from September through May. It provides a forum for the ideas, opinions, and news that affect medical students and showcases student writing, research, and artwork. The articles and viewpoints in Pulse are not necessarily the policy of the AMA or JAMA. All submissions must be the original unpublished work of the author. Work submitted to Pulse is subject to review and editing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative attitudes of medical students and medical professionals toward the field of geriatric medicine have been previously described 1,2 . A variety of interrelated issues lie at the heart of the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative attitudes of medical students and medical professionals toward the field of geriatric medicine have been previously described 1,2 . A variety of interrelated issues lie at the heart of the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the Editor A recent Viewpoint provided historical perspective and drew attention to the paradox of geriatrics as a dying field at a time when society is rapidly aging. In retrospect, it seems that geriatrics was always “swimming against the tide” in a society that devalues aging . The US health care system and payers reward specialty care, procedures, and hospitalizations instead of comprehensive, integrated, value-based care for an aging society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%