Steep 2012
DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520274228.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing Populist Resentments in the Tea Party Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with current literature on the Tea Party (Berlet, 2012;Trost and Rosenthal, 2012) and other disciplines. 'High ingroup solidarity' often transpires and serves as a defence mechanism for reflections about the opposing side (Goffman, 1959: 209).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with current literature on the Tea Party (Berlet, 2012;Trost and Rosenthal, 2012) and other disciplines. 'High ingroup solidarity' often transpires and serves as a defence mechanism for reflections about the opposing side (Goffman, 1959: 209).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Ashbee, 2011;Berlet, 2012;Skocpol and Williamson, 2011;Throgmorton, 2013). The fourth narrative on increased citizen engagement (Disch, 2012) does not have readily available national data for this measure.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved with some sophistication. As was often noted by observers, Tea Party members distinguished between different kinds of government policies (Berlet 2012, Disch 2012, Williamson, Skocpol and Coggin 2011. The activists' vitriolic attacks on federal government programs usually exempted the two largest programs in the national budget: Social Security and Medicare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Tea Party members tend to be in a financial situation whereby they lack significant wealth yet are unable to receive social welfare services (Skocpol and Williamson 2012). As a result, they feel attacked from both people below them in the social hierarchy benefiting from such programs, and perceived elitists who make the policy decisions that fund social welfare programs (Berlet 2012b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%