2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-019-9124-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractory Black Carbon Results and a Method Comparison between Solid-state Cutting and Continuous Melting Sampling of a West Antarctic Snow and Firn Core

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works have shown that the Marin‐5 nebulization efficiency is not size dependent in the 200–3,000 nm diameter range (Katich et al, 2017; Mori et al, 2016). The nebulization efficiency for the Marin‐5 at CWU was calculated to be 68.31% ± 5.91% (1 σ ) (Marquetto, Kaspari, Simões, & Babik, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous works have shown that the Marin‐5 nebulization efficiency is not size dependent in the 200–3,000 nm diameter range (Katich et al, 2017; Mori et al, 2016). The nebulization efficiency for the Marin‐5 at CWU was calculated to be 68.31% ± 5.91% (1 σ ) (Marquetto, Kaspari, Simões, & Babik, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal calibration was carried out on CWU's SP2 using a Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA) to mass‐select BC particles of a known polydisperse BC standard consisting of Aquadag (Acheson Industries Inc., Port Huron, MI, USA) diluted in Milli‐Q water (MilliQ‐Element, Millipore, Milford, USA; 18.2 M Ω). Aquadag was also used for the daily SP2 external calibration (details of the external calibration are in Marquetto, Kaspari, Simões, & Babik, 2020). The use of a CPMA to mass‐select BC particles in the SP2 internal calibration is recommended in Schwarz et al (2012) to reduce uncertainties associated with detection of large rBC particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Katich et al (2017) managed to get nebulization efficiencies near 100% with their equipment set up. We calculated the CWU Marin-5 nebulization efficiency to be 68.3 ± 5.9% (1σ) based on the external calibration carried out every working day using Aquadag standards (Marquetto et al, 2019). We found a decrease in nebulization efficiency during the laboratory work period (-0.31% per working day or -13.3% over the 43 working days), but we assume the nebulization efficiency to remain stable between the measurement of the standard and the samples measured for the day, as Katich et al (2017).…”
Section: Rbc Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%