2003
DOI: 10.1039/b208765k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive indices, molar volumes and molar refractions of binary liquid mixtures: concepts and correlationsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Table of data (S1) and figures (S1–S5). See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cp/b2/b208765k/Presented in part at the 17th IUPAC Conference on Chemical Thermodynamics, July 2002, Rostok, Germany.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to remark that experimental D mix n values given by Equation (38) have frequently been interpreted as excess refractive indices of mixtures, as recommended by Brocos et al [14] By contrast, no n E values calculated in terms of Equations (39) or (40) could be found in the literature. On the other hand, reporting the empirically defined change Dn(x A ) = nÀ(x A n A * +x B n B * ) is popular, although it can exhibit the opposite sign of D mix n, as for example in binary mixtures of 1,3-dioxalane with pentan-2-one, heptan-2-one or cyclopentanone at 298 K. [29] We advance the suggestion to base the analysis of refractive indices of real mixtures on the sign of n E .…”
Section: Refractive Index Of Mixing and Excess Refractive Indexmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to remark that experimental D mix n values given by Equation (38) have frequently been interpreted as excess refractive indices of mixtures, as recommended by Brocos et al [14] By contrast, no n E values calculated in terms of Equations (39) or (40) could be found in the literature. On the other hand, reporting the empirically defined change Dn(x A ) = nÀ(x A n A * +x B n B * ) is popular, although it can exhibit the opposite sign of D mix n, as for example in binary mixtures of 1,3-dioxalane with pentan-2-one, heptan-2-one or cyclopentanone at 298 K. [29] We advance the suggestion to base the analysis of refractive indices of real mixtures on the sign of n E .…”
Section: Refractive Index Of Mixing and Excess Refractive Indexmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is no universally agreed definition for the refractive index of thermodynamically ideal liquid mixtures, although Brocos et al [14] have argued in favour of adopting our n(unmixed) as calculated by Equation (6) for this purpose. Here we develop a theoretical approach to this question based on the relationship between refractive indices and high-frequency relative permittivities, together with a recent molecular [6b] and thermodynamic [6a,c,d] derivation of the ideal mixing law for relative permittivities.…”
Section: Ideal Refractive Index Of a Mixturementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lorentz-Lorenz equation (3,4,and 5) 28 were used to calculate (nD1, nD2 and nD) as follows: Fig-2 illustrates the relation between ∆nD against mole fraction (X1) for the THFA .…”
Section: Refractive Index Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%