2011
DOI: 10.1021/je200969r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive Index of Liquid D2O for Visible Wavelengths

Abstract: The index of refraction for D 2 O at common wavelengths was measured for several temperatures at atmospheric pressure. While heavy water's refractive index was precisely measured decades ago using the transition lines of elements, those wavelengths are seldom used now that inexpensive lasers provide a range of available wavelengths. We review those measurements, note some inconsistencies between research groups, and fit the best of the literature data to a simple equation that allows an easy calculation for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“… is the ratio of the observed and radiative luminescence lifetimes ( τ obs and τ rad , respectively). The latter for Eu(III) can be calculated from the luminescence spectrum using Equation (1), where A MD,0 is the spontaneous emission probability for the 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 transition of Eu(III) in vacuo with a value of 14.65 s −1 , n is the refractive index of the medium (1.333 for H 2 O [ 43 ] and 1.328 for D 2 O [ 44 ]), and I tot and I MD are the total corrected Eu(III) emission spectrum (521–800 nm) and the 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 band (582–603 nm), respectively [ 42 ]. The obtained values are summarized in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… is the ratio of the observed and radiative luminescence lifetimes ( τ obs and τ rad , respectively). The latter for Eu(III) can be calculated from the luminescence spectrum using Equation (1), where A MD,0 is the spontaneous emission probability for the 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 transition of Eu(III) in vacuo with a value of 14.65 s −1 , n is the refractive index of the medium (1.333 for H 2 O [ 43 ] and 1.328 for D 2 O [ 44 ]), and I tot and I MD are the total corrected Eu(III) emission spectrum (521–800 nm) and the 5 D 0 → 7 F 1 band (582–603 nm), respectively [ 42 ]. The obtained values are summarized in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum yields were then calculated according to (3). The given relative error on the quantum yields (δ Φ = Δ Φ / Φ , where Δ Φ is the absolute error) take into account the accuracy of the spectrometer and of the integration procedure [δ( I s / I ref ) < 2%], an error of 0.59 ± 0.01 on the quantum yield of the reference QS [δ( Φ ref ) < 2%], an error on the ratio of the absorption factors [δ( f Aref / f As ) < 5%, relative to the fixed absorption factor of the reference QS] and an error on the ratio of the squared refractive indexes [δ( n s 2 / n ref 2 ) < 1%, < 0.25% around 1.333 for H 2 O [ 43 ] and 1.328 for D 2 O [ 44 ] on each individual refractive index], which sums to a total estimated relative error that should be δ Φ s < 10%. A limit value of 10% is thus chosen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis required the shear viscosity, measured by rheometry (as above), and the refractive index of D 2 O [12]. The correlation function was fitted using DynaLS version 2.8.3 (Alango Ltd.).…”
Section: Rheometry and Dynamic Light Scattering (Dls) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is used to compute the propagation constants of the core and plasmon modes in the structure. The wavelength dependence of the refractive index of silica [8][9][10] , distilled water 11 , gold [8][9]12 , heavy water 13 and GaP 14 has been modeled by using, respectively, a Sellmeier formula for SiO 2 , GaP, H 2 O and D 2 O and a Drude relation for Au.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the effective index for HE 11 , TE 01 and TM 01 modes, calculated with the analytical method (respectively, 1.435774, 1.416931, 1.414350) resulted very close to those obtained with the finite element method (respectively, 1.435771, 1.416934, 1.414350). Note that, using a linear combination of K and H 1 functions (as in [13][14] but with smaller operating dimensions) instead of J and Y functions, the results computed with the analytical and numerical methods are different. As for the other case, always assuming a 20 nm thick "plasmonic" layer, but this time of pure gold, we have at 0.85 µm n 3 = 0.243806 + 4.934597i.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%