1994
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90023-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive index of decapsulated bovine lens surfaces measured with a reflectometric sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 (22,28), and r ¼ 1.18g/cm 3 and n ¼ 1.43 for bovine lenses used in Figs. 5 and 6 (29,30). We estimate that the conversion error due to sample-to-sample variations in r/n 2 is relatively small and does not affect the correlation between the Brillouin modulus and Young's modulus (see Supporting Material).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…6 (22,28), and r ¼ 1.18g/cm 3 and n ¼ 1.43 for bovine lenses used in Figs. 5 and 6 (29,30). We estimate that the conversion error due to sample-to-sample variations in r/n 2 is relatively small and does not affect the correlation between the Brillouin modulus and Young's modulus (see Supporting Material).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To approximate the modification in dioptric power that the changes in volume in our experiments represent, the bovine lens photographs were further analyzed. The radii of curvatures at the two accommodative states were measured, and together with the A-P thickness (previously measured) plus the refrac- tive indexes for the lens, aqueous, and vitreous humor (21,22), the equivalent dioptric power of the bovine lens was computed using the Gullstrand's equation for thick lenses. From 11 bovine lenses, a mean value of 14.8 Ϯ 0.25 D was calculated for the unaccommodated (stretched) lens, whereas the value for the accommodated (relaxed) lens was 16.3 Ϯ 0.23 D. These values probably represent only a fraction of the total equivalent power for the whole simplified eye.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For present purposes, a large number of shells may not be necessary, provided the accuracy is not significantly impaired by the use of a reduced number of iso‐indicial shells. The gradient index requirement may not be as critically important for extremely oblique rays, as suggested by the refractive index measurements in the equatorial plane by Pierscionek (1994). However, this would need to be experimentally confirmed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%