1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.364443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive index as a function of photon energy for AlGaAs between 1.2 and 1.8 eV

Abstract: An expression of refractive indices for AlGaAs is presented which agrees reasonably with the experimental results by H. C. Casey Jr., D. D. Shell, and M. B. Panish [Appl. Phys. Lett. 24, 63 (1974)]. This expression is approximately derived by using the method of least squares and is applicable to a determination of the refractive indices of AlxGa1−xAs with x in the range 0<x<0.38 and for photon energy range between 1.2 and 1.8 eV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MDF is not very accurate, and several modifications have been proposed recently. 24,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Kim et al 23 model with the Lorentzian broadening is very similar to that of MDF, while their model with the Gaussian broadening shows a significant improvement in the accuracy. This indicates that the broadening function approximation is responsible for the large discrepancies between the MDF and the experiment in the vicinity of the fundamental band gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MDF is not very accurate, and several modifications have been proposed recently. 24,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Kim et al 23 model with the Lorentzian broadening is very similar to that of MDF, while their model with the Gaussian broadening shows a significant improvement in the accuracy. This indicates that the broadening function approximation is responsible for the large discrepancies between the MDF and the experiment in the vicinity of the fundamental band gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Adachi's model is not very accurate, and several modifications have been proposed recently. 3,[23][24][25][26][27][28]34 Jenkins 24 has obtained better agreement with the experimental data by introducing an exponential decay of matrix elements which are taken to be constant over the Brillouin zone in Adachi's model. Nonetheless, this model gives good agreement with the experi-mental data only in the narrow range, and for AlAs, the calculated values differ from the experimental ones for a constant amount below 3 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Forouhi and Bloomer 19 have proposed a model which is also related to the band structure and requires fewer parameters ͑up to 14͒. However, for the materials investigated here, this model does not bring about significant improvement in accuracy over the conventional Adachi's model, especially around the fundamental band-gap E 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%