2011
DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.024061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive index and dispersion of butterfly chitin and bird keratin measured by polarizing interference microscopy

Abstract: Using Jamin-Lebedeff interference microscopy, we measured the wavelength dependence of the refractive index of butterfly wing scales and bird feathers. The refractive index values of the glass scales of the butterfly Graphium sarpedon are, at wavelengths 400, 500 and 600 nm, 1.572, 1.552 and 1.541, and those of the feather barbules of the white goose Anas anas domestica are 1.569, 1.556 and 1.548, respectively. The dispersion spectra of the chitin in the butterfly scales and the keratin in the bird barbules ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
181
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
181
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The total reflection is remarkably low in the visible regime. In comparison with the bare glass, which is known to reflect about 8% of light under normal incidence (two surfaces 13 ), the glasswing reflection of 2% (two surfaces) in the visible regime is about four times lower while their refractive indices are quite close [14][15][16] . The low reflection is also observed for wavelengths in the ultraviolet to near infrared (NIR) regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total reflection is remarkably low in the visible regime. In comparison with the bare glass, which is known to reflect about 8% of light under normal incidence (two surfaces 13 ), the glasswing reflection of 2% (two surfaces) in the visible regime is about four times lower while their refractive indices are quite close [14][15][16] . The low reflection is also observed for wavelengths in the ultraviolet to near infrared (NIR) regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For an easy comparison of different models and shapes, we use normalized scaling z à ¼ z h in the following. We assume a typical refractive index of chitin and air without absorption as n chitin ¼ 1.57 [14][15][16] and n air ¼ 1, respectively. The dash-dotted line in Fig.…”
Section: Dt Is the Complementary Error Function The Remaining Fractimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, unsurprisingly, higher refractive indices result in a stronger average reflectance, up to 84% for n = 2.8 (i.e., close to that of rutile titanium dioxide, a synthetic dielectric material commonly employed in photo nic applications [22] ), the broadband reflectivity rapidly decays for n < 1.6. Given the fact that the refractive index of chitin, varying from 1.6 to 1.55 (blue to red wavelengths, respectively), is among the highest found for purely organic biological materials, [23,24] this simulation illustrates yet another aspect of optical optimization of the network morphology.…”
Section: (4 Of 6)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While, unsurprisingly, higher refractive indices result in a stronger average reflectance, up to 84% for n = 2.8 (i.e., close to that of rutile titanium dioxide, a synthetic dielectric material commonly employed in photo nic applications [22] ), the broadband reflectivity rapidly decays for n < 1.6. Given the fact that the refractive index of chitin, varying from 1.6 to 1.55 (blue to red wavelengths, respectively), is among the highest found for purely organic biological materials, [23,24] this simulation illustrates yet another aspect of optical optimization of the network morphology.The careful balance of structural parameters described above begets the question whether the random network morphology exhibits hidden correlations that optimize the scattering of incident light. This question is motivated by the consideration that the optimization of the scattering strength requires an average distance between scatterers just above the wavelength of visible light (to avoid optical crowding) and the absence of periodic order (to avoid a photonic bandgap [25,26] ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the reflected spectrum, such interference appears as an oscillation and we refer to each reflectance peak as a spectral fringe. The wavelength‐dependent refractive index for chitin (Leertouwer, Wilts, & Stavenga, 2011) of n (λ)  = 1.517 + 8,800 nm 2 /λ 2 was employed. The refractive index only varies 2% over the visible range, and the Brewster angle, θ Br  = tan −1 ( n ), only changes less than 1° across the spectrum, though.…”
Section: Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%