2016
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive errors

Abstract: SUMMARYBackground: All over the world, refractive errors are among the most frequently occuring treatable disturbances of visual function. Ametropias have a prevalence of nearly 70% among adults in Germany and are thus of great epidemiologic and socio-economic relevance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A cross-sectional study conducted amongst Polish children aged six to eighteen years compared the effect of different types of electric lights in different rooms in their homes on the prevalence of refractive errors [ 42 ]. Refractive errors are caused by a defect in the eye shape which results in difficulty focusing on an image, causing blurred vision [ 55 ]. Only a higher prevalence of hyperopia (farsightedness) amongst those using fluorescent lights compared to incandescent lights (15% vs. 11%) in the kitchen were statistically significant of the five refractive errors assessed in the study [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-sectional study conducted amongst Polish children aged six to eighteen years compared the effect of different types of electric lights in different rooms in their homes on the prevalence of refractive errors [ 42 ]. Refractive errors are caused by a defect in the eye shape which results in difficulty focusing on an image, causing blurred vision [ 55 ]. Only a higher prevalence of hyperopia (farsightedness) amongst those using fluorescent lights compared to incandescent lights (15% vs. 11%) in the kitchen were statistically significant of the five refractive errors assessed in the study [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation was conducted by determining the material properties of each hydrogel material through tensile testing, modelling the contact lenses fitting process using finite element analysis, and using light raytracing analysis, to measure the effective power change induced by the lens. A clinically acceptable EPC was included in the analysis as |∆P| ≤ 0.25 [28,29]. This value was determined by considering the fact that, in clinical practice, trial lenses are varied in increments of 0.25 D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the clinical visual acuity test is carried out at a distance of 6.0 m which induces a 0.167 D accommodation, this power is considered as clinically negligible. Therefore, the trial lenses are in 0.25 D steps and EPCs were considered to be clinically acceptable if |ΔP| ≤ 0.25 D [27, 28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%