1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1989.tb00336.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforming the Taxation of Capital Gains, Gifts and Inheritances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Stiglitz (1983) showed that capital gains tax rates can, in fact, be avoided altogether in a perfect capital market where transactions are costless by borrowing, hedging, accelerating losses, and deferring gains. In the United Kingdom, capital gains are treated more favorably than other forms of income because capital gains tax is payable in arrears, deferred on gifts, and gives relief on retirement and exemptions on death (e.g., Robinson (1989)). Thus a drop in ex‐day prices in a particular period cannot be related directly to the differential taxation of dividends and capital gains because the effective capital gains tax rates are not known.…”
Section: Institutional Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Stiglitz (1983) showed that capital gains tax rates can, in fact, be avoided altogether in a perfect capital market where transactions are costless by borrowing, hedging, accelerating losses, and deferring gains. In the United Kingdom, capital gains are treated more favorably than other forms of income because capital gains tax is payable in arrears, deferred on gifts, and gives relief on retirement and exemptions on death (e.g., Robinson (1989)). Thus a drop in ex‐day prices in a particular period cannot be related directly to the differential taxation of dividends and capital gains because the effective capital gains tax rates are not known.…”
Section: Institutional Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 This gives rise to some challenges resulting from the 'lumpiness' of these types of receipt, but Meade et al (1978, ch.7) identify several possible solutions using different approaches to averaging; the policy would be otherwise relatively straightforward to implement from an administrative -if not political -perspective. 35 Although proposals have been made along these lines in the past (Goodhart, 1988;Robinson, 1989), recently the option of taxing inheritances and gifts as income has not received as many backers as the lifetime receipts tax. 36 It is difficult to discern the reasons for this, but a relative lack of international examples -compared with a lifetime receipts tax -may be one explanation.…”
Section: Comprehensive Income Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%