2017
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2016.1244580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production over Ni based catalysts: Effect of support type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the common use of Eq. ( 14) in the existing GDR studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] allowed direct comparison of the present results with the glycerol conversions reported in the literature. The results reported in the present study were found to be reproducible in all cases, as the difference between the performance metrics (X CO2 , X G and Y i ) of successive experiments remained below 1%.…”
Section: Catalytic Performance Experimentssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the common use of Eq. ( 14) in the existing GDR studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] allowed direct comparison of the present results with the glycerol conversions reported in the literature. The results reported in the present study were found to be reproducible in all cases, as the difference between the performance metrics (X CO2 , X G and Y i ) of successive experiments remained below 1%.…”
Section: Catalytic Performance Experimentssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, superior activity and stability of Rh in dry reforming of hydrocarbons [31][32][33][34][35] inspired us to use it as a benchmark precious metal catalyst for the cheaper, yet promising alternatives, such as Ni and Co. For the first time in the literature, we report superior Rh/AZT and Ni/AZT catalysts both of which can deliver > 90% of the thermodynamic CO 2 and glycerol conversions with negligible activity loss. These catalysts clearly outperform the existing Rh-and Ni-based catalysts previously reported in the literature [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. In the current work, in addition to activity and stability tests, AZT supported Rh, Ni and Co catalysts were also characterized before and after GDR reaction by means of in-situ/ex-situ spectroscopic/imaging techniques to provide valuable insights regarding the molecular-level origins of catalytic activity and stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon was due to the CaO support basicity, which causes a number of positive effects, such as (i) reducing carbon accumulation and sintering of the metal particles, (ii) improving the metal dispersion on the support, as well as (iii) improving the metal reducibility and interactions with the support. 215 3.7. Urea Synthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%