Reforming Everywhere and All at Once: Transitioning to Free Labor across the British Empire, 1837–1838

Abstract

In late 1837 and early 1838 the British imperial government was preparing for an empire-wide transition from bonded to nominally free labor. This article builds upon recent scholarship that promotes a holistic, global approach to this transition, by narrowing the temporal frame and expanding the spatial. We emphasize interconnectivity and simultaneity rather than chronological succession, and we analyze the governance, rather than the experience, of this transition. Our approach is founded upon analysis of correspondence passing from every British colonial site through the Colonial Office in 1837–1838. We suggest that this hub of imperial government sought to reconcile the persistence of different conditions in each colony with the pursuit of three overarching policy objectives: redistributing labor globally; distinguishing between the moral debts owed to different kinds of bonded labor, and managing tradeoffs between security, economy, and morality. We conclude that the governance of the transition to free labor is best conceived as an assemblage of material and expressive elements of different spatial scales, whose interactions were complex and indeterminate. Through these specific governmental priorities and a particular communications infrastructure, these elements were brought into critical alignment at this moment to shape a significant transition in relations between people across the world.

Protecting the Colony from its People: Bushranging, Vagrancy, and Social Control in Colonial New South Wales

“…The paper described a circumstance whereby a constable could stop any person and force them to give an account of themselves, their residence and their livelihood as akin to slavery: a claim with particular resonance considering that slavery was nominally abolished in the British Empire 2 years previously. 102 It was not only the interrogation itself, but the constables entrusted with this mandate that offended the Gazette. "Ruffianly constables are already vested with too great an extent of unconstitutional powers, without adding to it the right to interrogate free men, in any part of the colony, and of enforcing an answer to their insolent queries .…”

Colonial Britain's Convict Labour Policies and the Cape Colony, 1806-1899

“…indentured labour. 3 Convict labour was not classified as forced labour however if a government authority directed the work. It was, however, of a forced nature if a prisoner was 'placed at the disposal of private individuals, companies or associations'.…”

Trading Sovereignty and Labour: The Consular Network of Nineteenth-Century Hawai‘i

“…By indicating how the intersecting commitments of the Hawaiian state and an emerging plantation complex to sponsored migration drove the expansion of the Hawaiian consular system, I seek to complement Kate Boehme, Peter Mitchell and Alan Lester's recent work on the nexus between state and mercantile actors in indentured labour migration in the post-emancipation British imperial context. 6 One of the most complicated international issues faced by the Hawaiian state during independence was how to secure sponsored migrants, variously envisioned as immigrants or contract labourers, in a world defined by the accelerating global partition of territory among a handful of major Western powers (plus Japan) and the development of international norms governing international mobility, particularly that of putative imperial subjects. During the final quarter of the nineteenth century, the Kingdom of Hawai'i embarked on an ambitious and expensive sponsored migration programme that demographically transformed the island chain.…”